You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caribbean-Latin America
Cuba, Venezuela may host Russian bombers
2009-03-14
testing our young O-president to see just how empty that suit is
A Russian Air Force chief said Saturday that Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has offered an island as a temporary base for strategic Russian bombers, the Interfax news agency reported.

The chief of staff of Russia's long range aviation, Maj. Gen. Anatoly Zhikharev, also said Cuba could be used to base the aircraft, Interfax reported.

The Kremlin, however, said the situation was hypothetical.
of course it is - a trial balloon
"The military is speaking about technical possibilities, that's all," Alexei Pavlov, a Kremlin official, told the Associated Press. "If there will be a development of the situation, then we can comment," he said.

Zhikharev said Chavez had offered "a whole island with an airdrome, which we can use as a temporary base for strategic bombers," the agency reported. "If there is a corresponding political decision, then the use of the island ... by the Russian Air Force is possible."
bring your own fuel
Interfax reported he said earlier that Cuba has air bases with four or five runways long enough for the huge bombers and could be used to host the long-range planes.

Two Russian bombers landed in Venezuela last year in what experts said was the first Western Hemisphere touchdown of Russian military craft since the end of the Cold War.
what would we do with "experts"?
Cuba has never permanently hosted Russian or Soviet strategic aircraft. But Soviet short-range bombers often made stopovers there during the Cold War.

Russia resumed long-range bomber patrols in 2007 after a 15-year hiatus.

Independent military analyst Alexander Golts said from a strategic point of view there was nothing for Russia to gain from basing long-range craft within relatively short range of U.S. shores. "It has no military sense. The bombers don't need any base. This is just a retaliatory gesture," Golts said, saying Russia wanted to hit back after U.S. ships patrolled Black Sea waters.
Posted by:Frank G

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Flagg   2009-03-14 21:35  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2009-03-14 19:04  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2009-03-14 18:14  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2009-03-14 17:00  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Uncle Phester   2009-03-14 16:36  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2009-03-14 16:09  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2009-03-14 16:08  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Omesing Hitler6107   2009-03-14 15:58  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Silentbrick   2009-03-14 14:22  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Steve White   2009-03-14 14:12  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2009-03-14 12:11  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: SteveS   2009-03-14 11:45  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: rabid whitetail   2009-03-14 11:15  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Glenmore   2009-03-14 08:22  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: WTF   2009-03-14 08:08  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2009-03-14 07:10  

00:00