You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
Zoomies pissed that Cyber Command stole SAC's patch
2008-04-09
Cyber Command’s new emblem can’t be anointed officially until the new command is stood up this October, but the one in the works replicates the former Strategic Air Command’s patch.

Only “minor modifications” have been made to the SAC emblem to create AFCYBER’s design and “bring it up to current Air Force emblem standards,” according to service documents.

“By assuming the lineage of the Strategic Air Command, cyber-warriors demonstrate the ability to project strength and achieve global effects with the inclusion of the cyberspace domain, with air and space,” according to lineage and heritage records.

But that striking similarity to Strategic Air Command’s patch has started a controversy. Former airmen who served under SAC have posted on multiple Internet blogs their displeasure at the almost identical designs.

“I respect the fact that our ‘cyber warriors’ are a critical asset in our force structure, but in my opinion they should wear a patch of their own design, not one lifted from a previous generation,” said retired Col. Ron Thurlow via e-mail.
Posted by:gromky

#19  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2008-04-09 13:32  

#18  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-04-09 13:24  

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-04-09 13:22  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: SteveS   2008-04-09 12:41  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Chief Running Gag   2008-04-09 12:21  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: GORT   2008-04-09 12:03  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2008-04-09 11:48  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: swksvolFF   2008-04-09 11:46  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-04-09 10:53  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: AlanC   2008-04-09 10:38  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2008-04-09 10:37  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: ed   2008-04-09 10:37  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anonymoose   2008-04-09 10:33  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: gromky   2008-04-09 10:33  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: RWV   2008-04-09 10:31  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-04-09 08:35  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-04-09 08:34  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Crolusing tse Tung2745   2008-04-09 01:41  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-04-09 00:55  

00:00