| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Problems with a Gore nomination |
| 2008-03-30 |
| Mark R. Levin, "The Corner" @ National Review So, the Democrat party's answer to the split between Hillary Clinton and Barak Obama might be to nominate Al Gore, who hasn't run in any primary or caucus. If that happens then none of the votes cast by any of the Democrat voters counted. They will all have disenfranchised. And how does a Gore nomination address all the talk by the Obama supporters that the convention must deliver the nomination to Obama as he has received (or will have received) the most popular votes and secured the most delegates? Finally, what about all the excitement over the possibility of the first woman or first black president? That goes down the tubes with the nomination of Gore. It seems to me that a Gore nomination creates serious problems for the Democrat Party. So, I would encourage the Democrats to do it. |
| Posted by:Mike |
| #17 |
| Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2008-03-30 19:33 |
| #16 |
| Posted by: 3dc 2008-03-30 19:19 |
| #15 |
| Posted by: Deacon Blues 2008-03-30 17:03 |
| #14 |
| Posted by: Frank G 2008-03-30 16:35 |
| #13 |
| Posted by: lotp 2008-03-30 16:35 |
| #12 |
| Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2008-03-30 16:33 |
| #11 |
| Posted by: Pappy 2008-03-30 16:30 |
| #10 |
| Posted by: Frank G 2008-03-30 16:27 |
| #9 |
| Posted by: Zebulon Angavick7428 2008-03-30 16:15 |
| #8 |
| Posted by: bigjim-ky 2008-03-30 15:08 |
| #7 |
| Posted by: tu3031 2008-03-30 13:49 |
| #6 |
| Posted by: James Carville 2008-03-30 11:56 |
| #5 |
| Posted by: Sock Puppet of Texas 2008-03-30 11:55 |
| #4 |
| Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2008-03-30 11:11 |
| #3 |
| Posted by: regular joe 2008-03-30 10:36 |
| #2 |
| Posted by: Mike Kozlowski 2008-03-30 10:18 |
| #1 |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2008-03-30 09:43 |