You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
World's Most Powerful Rail Gun Delivered to Navy
2008-01-29
For true sci-fi fans, any mention of a real-world rail gun will draw an instant, slightly audible gasp. Instead of relying on chemical propellants -- such as gunpowder -- a rail gun uses magnetic "rails" to launch a solid, nonexplosive projectile at incredible speed. Theoretically, rail guns would be able to precisely strike targets at extreme ranges, and would negate the risks associated with carrying around tons of explosive ammo. More to the point, they're cool-sounding, just like lasers.
Systems has delivered a functional, 32-megajoule Electro-Magnetic Laboratory Rail Gun (32-MJ LRG) to the U.S. Naval Surface Warfare Center
Which is why the news that BAE Systems has delivered a functional, 32-megajoule Electro-Magnetic Laboratory Rail Gun (32-MJ LRG) to the U.S. Naval Surface Warfare Center in Dahlgren, Va., is exciting. Installation of the laboratory launcher is currently under way, and according to BAE, this is the first step toward the Navy's goal of developing a tactical 64-megajoule ship-mounted weapon.

The lab version doesn't look particularly menacing -- more like a long, belt-fed airport screening device than like a futuristic cannon -- but the system will fire rounds at up to Mach 8, drawing on tremendous amounts of electricity to generate the current for each test shot. That, of course, is the problem with rail guns: Like lasers, they're out of step with modern-day generators and capacitors. Eight and 9-megajoule rail guns have been fired before, but providing 3 million amps of power per shot has been a limitation. At 32 megajoules, this new system appears to be the most powerful rail gun ever built, and the Office of Naval Research is installing additional capacitors at the Dahlgren facility to support it. The planned 64-megajoule weapon, if it's ever built, could require even more power -- a staggering 6 million amps.
Posted by:lotp

#28  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-01-29 22:04  

#27  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: SteveS   2008-01-29 21:33  

#26  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2008-01-29 21:24  

#25  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2008-01-29 19:08  

#24  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2008-01-29 19:08  

#23  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-01-29 17:24  

#22  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-01-29 17:23  

#21  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: lotp   2008-01-29 16:44  

#20  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2008-01-29 16:42  

#19  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2008-01-29 16:40  

#18  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2008-01-29 16:36  

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2008-01-29 16:33  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Rambler   2008-01-29 16:24  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: wxjames   2008-01-29 13:35  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2008-01-29 13:17  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Iblis   2008-01-29 12:12  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JFM   2008-01-29 11:44  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Rambler   2008-01-29 11:34  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: ed   2008-01-29 11:21  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2008-01-29 11:05  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anonymoose   2008-01-29 08:44  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2008-01-29 08:28  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: N guard   2008-01-29 08:01  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Thomas Woof   2008-01-29 06:36  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2008-01-29 05:48  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Tholush Squank4616   2008-01-29 04:36  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Elmamble Speaking for Boskone1869   2008-01-29 03:31  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: gorb   2008-01-29 02:44  

00:00