| Submit your comments on this article |
| -Lurid Crime Tales- |
| Fraudulent Voter Objects To Voter ID Law |
| 2008-01-11 |
| (via Neal Boortz) Looks like the bedwetters have gotten themselves into quite an ironic pickle. The Supreme Court is deciding on a case of voter ID requirements in Indiana. By now you know the liberal arguments ... it disenfranchises the poor, the minorities, the elderly, blah blah blah. Well it looks like someone didn't do their homework. Faye Buis-Ewing is 72 years old. She has become a "poster child" for the disenfranchised voter that will be protected under a voting system with no ID requirements. But now we've discovered one minor problem. Not only is Faye registered to vote, but she is registered in two different states. She claims two states as her primary residence. She received a homestead exemption on her property taxes ... in two different states. In other words, the leftist poster girl for their fight against voter identification laws is a criminal. What a shame. Faye could not only vote, but she could technically vote more than the average citizen registered in only one state! She explains that she and her husband "winter in Florida and summer in Indiana." Isn't that sweet? She says that she has never voted in Florida, but she has a Florida driver's license. And when she went to vote in Indiana in November 2006 with her Florida driver's license, they, logically, did not accept it. Doesn't seem like rocket science to me! But hey, this is the average voter we are speaking of. Now the League of Women Voters (I'm sure they are my biggest fans) say this experience is exactly the reason the law should be changed. No, ladies .... That is exactly the reason why the law should be upheld! I'll bet dollars to doughnuts that Faye is voting for Hillary Clinton. Maybe twice. Remember this. It's the Democrats who are opposed to Voter ID laws, and it is the MoveOn Democrats who have benefited more often than not from illegal voters casting ballots. Even a government school graduate can figure out why they don't want voters to have to prove who they are. Hell, even I can figure that out. |
| Posted by:Anonymoose |
| #6 |
| Posted by: regular joe 2008-01-11 22:11 |
| #5 |
| Posted by: USN,Ret. 2008-01-11 17:47 |
| #4 |
| Posted by: tu3031 2008-01-11 13:30 |
| #3 |
| Posted by: Silentbrick 2008-01-11 13:13 |
| #2 |
| Posted by: Whomong Guelph4611 2008-01-11 12:28 |
| #1 |
| Posted by: Raj 2008-01-11 11:12 |