It is interesting that [The Transformers] made 403492 grillion dollars, whereas the Cruise / Redford / Streep oration about War Being Bad averaged thirty-seven cents per theater. As many have noted elsewhere at great length, anti-war movies are unpopular. The theories vary: the public is tired of the war, the movies are lousy, the public doesnt want to see Uncle Sam portrayed as the sort of guy who cant wait to hook up a Diehard to the harbls of an innocent exchange student rounded up in the Bushilter Mandatory Scoop-Up-The-Dusky Initiative. Both sides will probably come to rest on the last answer, but for different reasons. One side takes cruel comfort in the fact that Americans CANT HANDLE THE TRUTH, as another Cruise movie so memorably accused, and the other side is convinced that Hollywood is so besotted by the vapors in its ideological pleasure-dome it cannot conceive of making a war movie that isnt a glass of warm spinach juice or, if its slam-bang rah-rah in concept, is laden down with hints and tics and cues designed to insulate the producers from the inevitable protests from all corners. You can almost hear the sighs of a producer looking at an incredible script about the drive to Baghdad, a straight-forward story that complete with straight-ahead, matter-of-fact drama: its a great script, but my wifes all hooked up with Code Pink. Not that I care; theyre a bunch of nuts. But I cant stand the people who think theyre a bunch of nuts for reasons different than mine. Also Im going to get CAIR writing letters to the editor, and my kid reads that paper. Well, she reads it online. Maybe. I dont know. It would probably show up on MySpacebook or something. But no ones going to get hard looks if Tom Cruise comes out against torture, right? I mean, whos gonna boo that at Cannes?
(Thank you, Mr. Strawman! Thank you for stating so succinctly what I suspect and believe. Remarkable.)
Its an old subject, and I was moaning about this years ago. And I probably said the same thing: wheres our Casablanca? |