You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Air America errs: Randi Rhodes not mugged
2007-10-17
"Captain Ed" Morissey
An update on yesterday's Rantburg article.

Earlier today, the port side of the blogosphere erupted in righteous indignation as reports that Air America radio host Randi Rhodes got mugged began to swirl. Many bloggers started blaming a nameless conservative mugger, and then began extending the indictment to the entire conservative movement. It served their prejudices to think that conservative meanies would lay in wait for Rhodes just to keep her from speaking Truth to Power, etc etc etc.

The only fly in the ointment? Rhodes never got mugged at all:

Air America radio host Randi Rhodes is temporarily off the air, but claims she was brutally attacked near her Manhattan apartment are bogus, her lawyer and a police source said today.

Fellow host Jon Elliott claimed on the liberal radio network that Rhodes had been mugged while walking her dog, Simon, on Sunday night. Elliot, who said Rhodes lost several teeth in the attack, waxed about a possible conspiracy. . . .

A police source said Rhodes never filed a report and never claimed to be the victim of a mugging. Cops from Manhattan's 17th Precinct called her attorney, who told them Rhodes was not a victim of a crime, the source said.

So what are we to make of this?

1. Air America lies, even when stories involve their own personnel. No one thought to give Randi a call to see how she was doing before Elliot decided to air his report? And no one thought to do so afterwards? The police ended up calling to see why no one reported the incident to them. That's just marvelous journalistic ethics.

2. Anyone who thinks that bigotry has no place in the liberal mindset has -- once again -- just received a material lesson to the contrary. Even without knowing anything about the attacker, several bloggers just decided that it had to be a politically motivated assault by a conservative. That's not leaping to conclusions, that's flying at jet speed to Paranoialand.

. . .

What an embarrassment, especially for Air America. They have once again demonstrated why no one listens to them, and it has nothing to do with the Fairness Doctrine. It has everything to do with credibility. They can't even do fact-checking with their colleagues, let alone anywhere else.

Addendum: I'm sorry to hear that Rhodes injured herself in a fall, and hope she feels better soon. I'm glad that she apparently still has all her teeth, too.

Michelle Malkin has more:

The nutroots are sorely disappointed. But the truth isn’t likely to stop them from believing that it’s the Reich-wing’s fault.

Rush Limbaugh tripped her! Ann Coulter silenced her! Karl Rove poisoned her dog!

Newsday: Talk show host apologizes for faulty report of NYC mugging…

Air America released a statement saying that “the reports of a presumed hate crime are unfounded.” Elliott followed that up with a retraction.

“I shouldn’t have speculated based on hearsay that Randi Rhodes had been mugged and that it may have been an attack from a right wing hate machine. I apologize for jumping to conclusions based on my incurable chronic Bush Derangement Syndrome an emotional reaction,” he said in a written statement.

Get the T-shirt here.
Posted by:Mike

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: eLarson   2007-10-17 21:02  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-10-17 19:19  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2007-10-17 18:34  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Icerigger   2007-10-17 18:13  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: eLarson   2007-10-17 15:18  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Unutle McGurque8861   2007-10-17 14:41  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2007-10-17 14:18  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Swamp Blondie   2007-10-17 13:31  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: mhw   2007-10-17 12:07  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Unutle McGurque8861   2007-10-17 11:43  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: AlanC   2007-10-17 11:40  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Raj   2007-10-17 11:05  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: tu3031   2007-10-17 10:52  

00:00