You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
US House passes $459 bln defense spending bill
2007-08-06
WASHINGTON - The US House of Representatives early Sunday passed a mammoth defense appropriations bill containing nearly 460 billion dollars in funding for the US military in fiscal 2008, slightly below President George W. BushÂ’s request. The bill that was rushed through in the dead of night contains no money for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as they are being funded through separate legislation.

The bill allocates 459.6 billion dollars to the Pentagon, against the 463.1 billion dollars the president had requested earlier this year. The measure contains nearly 23 billion dollars to improve health care for members of the military and broaden military medical research programs and 2.2 billion to finance a 3.5-percent military pay rise.

Another 925 million are allocated to specifically to address equipment shortfalls in order to help forces meet the demands of overseas deployments and respond to natural disasters here at home. The bill provides six billion dollars to boost the Army and Marine Corps by a total of 12,000 troops in order to reduce the pressure from extended deployments.
That should have been done in 2002.
It funds weapons programs like F-22 combat planes, the Joint Strike Fighter, and the controversial V-22 aircraft that can fly like a plane and helicopter. But it cut allocations for missile defense by more than 883 million dollars arguing that the president’s 8.5-billion-dollar request “included unrealistic missile deployment schedules.”
Usual Dhimmi nonsense on missile defense: it will never work so why fund it, even though parts of it already work today.
Posted by:Steve White

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Proocpius2k    2007-08-06 15:38  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2007-08-06 12:49  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: charger   2007-08-06 11:28  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Procopius2k   2007-08-06 09:26  

00:00