I wonder when they will start advocating sterilization for people who have had 2 children.
The paper by the Optimum Population Trust (OPT) will say that if couples had two children instead of three they could cut their familyÂ’s carbon dioxide output by the equivalent of 620 return flights a year between London and New York.
I knew we would get to this point sooner or later. Nutballs all.
John Guillebaud, co-chairman of OPT and emeritus professor of family planning at University College London, said: “The effect on the planet of having one child less is an order of magnitude greater than all these other things we might do, such as switching off lights. An extra child is the equivalent of a lot of flights across the planet.
I don't make any flights across the Planet. Can I go on boinking? Descisions, descisions! Turn off a light/
“The greatest thing anyone in Britain could do to help the future of the planet would be to have one less child.”
Horsepooky! This guy sounds similar to the one who said, "The Human Race is a disease on the planet."
In his latest comments the academic says that when couples are planning a family they should be encouraged to think about the environmental consequences. “The decision to have children should be seen as a very big one and one that should take the environment into account,” he added.
Sorry, Academic and John Guillebaud shouldn't be used in the same sentence.
Guillebaud says that, as a general guideline, couples should produce no more than two offspring.
This is from Times Online
"This report and the opinions supporting it are frighteningly close to Third Reich Eugenics. Who decides whose children should be born and whose are an eco-crime, i.e. "Unwertes Leben"?
This report gives the term Eco-fascism a whole new dimension."
The previous quote is not mine but I agree with the premise.