You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Trunks Could Bail in the Fall
2007-05-07
WASHINGTON (AP) - The House Republican leader said Sunday that GOP support could waver if President Bush's Iraq war policy does not succeed by the fall.
Some AP writer reading between the lines?
House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, said Bush's troop increase deserves a chance and should be funded even if benchmarks for success are not met. Last week, Bush vetoed a $124 billion bill to pay for Iraq and Afghanistan operations in part because it required troops to begin returning home by Oct. 1.

A senior House Democrat un-named, but probably from Caliphornia, said it would be "ridiculous" not to condition war money on progress in Iraq. Bush and his supporters say a fixed date is unworkable.

"We don't even have all of the 30,000 additional troops in Iraq yet, so we're supporting the president. We want this plan to have a chance of succeeding," Boehner said. "Over the course of the next three to four months, we'll have some idea how well the plan's working. Early signs are indicating there is clearly some success on a number of fronts," he said. But, he added, "By the time we get to September or October, members are going to want to know how well this is working, and if it isn't, what's Plan B."
That's "wavering", isn't it?
Of course there would be a 'Plan B' -- if Plan A doesn't work, you go to B, then C, then D. Point is, you do everything you can, both militarily and politically, to make Plan A work in the first place, and that includes not telling your enemy what your quit date is up front.
Thus far, Republicans have stood behind the president's increasingly unpopular war policies, including the troop increase and an open-ended war commitment.
More spin at link.
Posted by:Bobby

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: DMFD   2007-05-07 22:23  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: ed   2007-05-07 15:40  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2007-05-07 15:36  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: wxjames   2007-05-07 14:08  

00:00