You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Iraq war funding in limbo on Hill
2007-04-01
House and Senate negotiators won't meet to hammer out a final emergency war-funding bill until Congress' spring break ends April 16 -- a day after Pentagon officials say money starts running out for U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid balked at the deadline yesterday and cited a congressional report that showed war funds will not expire until July. "This study confirms that the president is once again attempting to mislead the public and create an artificial atmosphere of anxiety," said Mr. Reid, Nevada Democrat. "He is using scare tactics to defeat bipartisan legislation that would change course in Iraq."

The report by the Congressional Research Service, the legislature's public policy research arm, said the military could temporarily bridge a funding gap by transferring money from other accounts. Democratic aides on both sides of the Capitol do not expect a bill to reach President Bush's desk until late April, after military officials say a lack of money will disrupt troop training, equipment repair and eventually prolong war-zone deployments.

Mr. Bush -- who has vowed to veto the bill over its timetable for a troop withdrawal from Iraq -- is critical of lawmakers taking a spring break now but he hasn't discussed recalling them to finish the bill, a White House spokeswoman said. "The president was surprised to learn that Congress went on vacation today, and that the House didn't bother to appoint any conferees ... to help try to reconcile the differences between the Senate and the House bills," spokeswoman Dana Perino said at a press briefing. "And every day that the Congress fails to act on this request causes our military hardship and impacts readiness," she said.

Republicans say they have the votes to sustain a veto, and the narrow passage of both bills indicates they can. Two-thirds of each chamber must vote to override a veto.

More at link...
Posted by:Dave D.

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: RWV   2007-04-01 14:07  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Verlaine   2007-04-01 13:23  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: RWV   2007-04-01 12:11  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2007-04-01 10:31  

00:00