You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Bollywood star married to a tree (or two)
2007-02-04
Patna • A public interest litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Patna High Court against Bollywood star Aishwarya Rai for marrying trees to overcome astrological differences with her fiancé Abhishek Bachchan. Lawyer Shruti Singh, who filed the PIL earlier this week, says the ritual promotes untouchability. "I filed a PIL to stop such practices as reportedly conducted by actor Amitabh Bachchan for his future daughter-in-law Aishwarya Rai. It is in violation of Article 17 of the Constitution, which prohibits untouchability. It also violates fundamental human rights," said Shruti.

Aishwarya is a Manglik (astrologically Mars-bearing), which is believed to have negative consequences for her impending marriage. The actress is said to have married a peepal tree at Benaras, a banana tree at a Bangalore temple and a god's idol in Ayodhya. According to Shruti, the fact that Aishwarya had to marry the trees and the idol before marrying Abhishek, who is a non-Manglik, amounts to untouchability. "The rituals performed by Aishwarya, Amitabh and Abhishek would only promote superstitions and blind faith among common people," Shruti, who is also a women's rights activist said.

The activist has also demanded a public apology from the Bachchan family for asking Aishwarya to enter into such false marriages.
Posted by:Classer

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 3dc   2007-02-04 22:57  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Shieldwolf   2007-02-04 18:17  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JFM   2007-02-04 17:14  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: john   2007-02-04 16:44  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: ed   2007-02-04 16:42  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Elmereter Hupash6222   2007-02-04 16:36  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Sic_Semper_Tyrannus   2007-02-04 15:17  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: john   2007-02-04 14:06  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anonymoose   2007-02-04 13:46  

00:00