You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Terror Networks
Reacquainting ourselves with the unthinkable
2006-12-26
By THOMAS P.M. BARNETT
Quick! Name the country we turn into a parking lot the next time al-Qaida's network pulls off a 9/11. If your knee jerks toward Pakistan instead of Iran, your instincts are sound because conditions are falling into place for that scary scenario to unfold.

No, we won't be toppling a regime - much less nation building - anytime soon in a country of 170 million Muslims (eight times the size of Iraq). But the United States could readily find itself unleashing the "gravest possible consequences" (remember that spooky Cold War phrase?) inside Pakistan's borders - specifically the federally administered tribal areas that border Afghanistan.

This swath of remote mountain ranges has never been effectively governed by distant Islamabad, but it's where the Taliban have - according to The New York Times - recently set up a virtual mini-state. The tribal areas are also where most terrorism experts believe Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida's senior leaders operate openly in secure sanctuary.
That's something that really puzzles me. This swath of remote mountain ranges has never been effectively governed by distance Islamabad, or by distant Karachi, or by distant Delhi, or what have you. But a bunch of Arab hoodlums and Afghan rubes is able to waltz in and take over. Is there a reason for that? Or is the basic premise silly?
This mini-state grew out of a series of peace deals that Pakistan's government felt it had no choice but to offer to thousands of Taliban fighters who've taken up permanent residence in the tribal areas since fleeing Afghanistan. The accords offered the warriors respite from the Pakistani military in exchange for a cessation of cross-border attacks into Afghanistan.

But the net result has been even more frequent incursions, plus the Taliban have used brutal terrorist tactics to subdue any opposition from the indigenous tribes, executing dozens of local leaders who dared stand up to them.

Worse, as the Taliban's grip grows stronger, the mini-state becomes a regional magnet for jihadists eager to get a crack at the 40,000 American and NATO troops operating next door. That means Afghanistan gets far bloodier in 2007, just as Iraq's civil war hits its stride.
Posted by:.com

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 3dc   2006-12-26 21:11  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: gromgoru   2006-12-26 17:03  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-12-26 16:08  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frozen Al   2006-12-26 15:04  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Zenster   2006-12-26 13:37  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: KBK   2006-12-26 12:18  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: SpecOp35   2006-12-26 11:36  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: OldSpook   2006-12-26 10:58  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Excalibur   2006-12-26 10:58  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Jereting Elminemp7907   2006-12-26 10:51  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: jds   2006-12-26 10:00  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: ed   2006-12-26 09:07  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mark E.   2006-12-26 09:05  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2006-12-26 08:21  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Shipman   2006-12-26 08:18  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Zenster   2006-12-26 04:57  

00:00