You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
MADD and politicians: Alcohol detection device in EVERY vehicle
2006-11-20
Edited for brevity. Emphasis mine.
The threat of arrest and punishment, for decades the primary tactic against drunken drivers, is no longer working in the struggle to reduce the death toll, officials say, and they are proposing turning to technology — alcohol detection devices in every vehicle — to address the problem. In the first phase of the plan, Mothers Against Drunk Driving, backed by a national association of state highway officials and car manufacturers, will announce here on Monday a campaign to change drunken driving laws in 49 states to require that even first offenders install a device that tests drivers and shuts down the car if it detects alcohol.

Many states already require the devices, known as ignition interlocks, for people who have been convicted several times. Last year New Mexico became the first to make them mandatory after a first offense. With that tactic and others, the state saw an 11.3 percent drop in alcohol-related fatalities last year.

Officials say interlocks for first offenders are not a panacea but will reduce repeat offenses. They say the next step will be a program to develop devices to unobtrusively test every driver for alcohol and disable the vehicle.
More at link...
Posted by:Dar

#23  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2006-11-20 21:13  

#22  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: KBK   2006-11-20 20:50  

#21  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: KBK   2006-11-20 20:43  

#20  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Shipman   2006-11-20 19:33  

#19  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Thinemp Whimble2412   2006-11-20 19:26  

#18  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 49 Pan   2006-11-20 18:03  

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mark E.   2006-11-20 15:52  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Zenster   2006-11-20 15:25  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2006-11-20 14:32  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: tu3031   2006-11-20 14:18  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: wxjames   2006-11-20 14:15  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mark E.   2006-11-20 10:14  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mark Z   2006-11-20 10:12  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mark Z   2006-11-20 10:11  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: CrazyFool   2006-11-20 08:37  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Jackal   2006-11-20 08:34  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-11-20 08:33  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Shipman   2006-11-20 07:44  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: no mo uro   2006-11-20 06:52  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: twobyfour   2006-11-20 03:14  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: badanov   2006-11-20 02:29  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: RD   2006-11-20 02:25  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: RD   2006-11-20 02:23  

00:00