You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
Why Politicized Science is Dangerous
2006-11-14
(Excerpted from State of Fear)

Imagine that there is a new scientific theory that warns of an impending crisis, and points to a way out.

This theory quickly draws support from leading scientists, politicians and celebrities around the world. Research is funded by distinguished philanthropies, and carried out at prestigious universities. The crisis is reported frequently in the media. The science is taught in college and high school classrooms.

I don't mean global warming. I'm talking about another theory, which rose to prominence a century ago.

Its supporters included Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and Winston Churchill. It was approved by Supreme Court justices Oliver Wendell Holmes and Louis Brandeis, who ruled in its favor. The famous names who supported it included Alexander Graham Bell, inventor of the telephone; activist Margaret Sanger; botanist Luther Burbank; Leland Stanford, founder of Stanford University; the novelist H. G. Wells; the playwright George Bernard Shaw; and hundreds of others. Nobel Prize winners gave support. Research was backed by the Carnegie and Rockefeller Foundations. The Cold Springs Harbor Institute was built to carry out this research, but important work was also done at Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford and Johns Hopkins. Legislation to address the crisis was passed in states from New York to California.
Posted by:anonymous5089

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: phil_b   2006-11-14 09:20  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2006-11-14 09:20  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bright Pebbles in Blairistan   2006-11-14 09:13  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bright Pebbles in Blairistan   2006-11-14 09:12  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2006-11-14 08:12  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2006-11-14 08:08  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: phil_b   2006-11-14 08:06  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2006-11-14 07:34  

00:00