You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Lieberman calls himself "Independent Democrat" for now... won't say no to future switch
2006-11-13
Sen. Joe Lieberman on Sunday repeated his pledge to caucus with Senate Democrats when the 110th Congress convenes in January, but refused to slam the door on possibly moving to the Republican side of the aisle. Asked on NBC's "Meet the Press" if he might follow the example of Sen. Jim Jeffords of Vermont, who left the Republicans in 2001 and became an independent, ending Republican control of the U.S. Senate, Lieberman refused to discount the possibility.

"I'm not ruling it out but I hope I don't get to that point," he said. "And I must say -- and with all respect to the Republicans who supported me in Connecticut -- nobody ever said, 'We're doing this because we want you to switch over. We want you to do what you think is right and good for our state and country,' and I appreciate that."

And more from the Seattle Post-Intelligencer:

In an e-mail message late Thursday, Lieberman's spokesman said the senator will begin his new term as a Democrat. The senator is in line to become chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. Interesting.

"I'm going to caucus with the Democrats both because it's good for my constituents in Connecticut, because I retained my seniority, I become a committee chair, but also I want to continue to work to bring the party back to its historic traditions of strength on national security, foreign policy and innovation and progress in domestic policy," Lieberman said Sunday.
Posted by:trailing wife

#21  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JAB   2006-11-13 21:27  

#20  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: OldSpook   2006-11-13 20:04  

#19  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: OldSpook   2006-11-13 20:02  

#18  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: OldSpook   2006-11-13 20:01  

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2006-11-13 18:27  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: anon   2006-11-13 18:14  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: OldSpook   2006-11-13 16:53  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Steve White   2006-11-13 16:09  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: anon   2006-11-13 14:10  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: DoDo   2006-11-13 13:58  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JohnQC   2006-11-13 12:11  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: anon   2006-11-13 12:03  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: OldSpook   2006-11-13 11:42  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: anon   2006-11-13 11:04  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Steve White   2006-11-13 11:02  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Grunter   2006-11-13 11:01  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: anon   2006-11-13 09:14  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: anon   2006-11-13 09:13  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2006-11-13 03:07  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: exJAG   2006-11-13 02:45  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Sneaze Shaiting3550   2006-11-13 01:25  

00:00