You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Republican senator won't concede in Montana
2006-11-09
Democrat Jon Tester declared victory over Republican Sen. Conrad Burns in Montana on Wednesday in a close contest, but the incumbent declined to concede in a race crucial to control of the U.S. Senate. "We won this thing," Tester, the state senate president and organic farmer, told a Great Falls news conference.

U.S. media called the election for Tester even as some results continued to be tallied after a night of uncertainty. "Jon Tester ran a good race and has the lead right now, but it is extremely close," Burns said in a statement. "There are still votes out there that deserve to be counted. I believe we need to continue to let that process play itself out and there is no need to rush to a conclusion when the votes are this close."

A Democratic win in Montana would give the party 50 seats in the 100-seat U.S. Senate, with the only undecided contest in Virginia. "It's over," Democratic Gov. Brian Schweitzer, who campaigned for Tester, said by telephone. Burns is "no longer a U.S. senator come January."

Incumbent Burns, first elected in 1988, was tainted by links to convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff and his campaign was marred by several gaffes. Montanans have traditionally voted Republican. Updated unofficial results from the Montana secretary of state's office said Tester won 176,857 votes, compared to 175,059 for Burns. A recount would be allowed if the margin of victory in the official Montana tally is 0.5 percent or less of votes cast -- a possibility given the tight contest.
Posted by:Fred

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: George W Bush   2006-11-09 14:17  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: anon   2006-11-09 22:21  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2006-11-09 18:23  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: OldSpook   2006-11-09 16:58  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Dreadnought   2006-11-09 13:56  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: anon   2006-11-09 12:40  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2006-11-09 12:40  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: anon   2006-11-09 12:39  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Dreadnought   2006-11-09 11:58  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Jackal   2006-11-09 09:05  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-11-09 05:58  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-11-09 01:33  

00:00