You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Instapundit watches The Path to 9/11
2006-09-11
Yes, the Democrats have shown their usual instinct for the capillary. While worrying about minor bits, they've missed that the real harm is simply the reminder of the terrorist threat, which they've tried to downplay, but which they've magnified in people's minds by making a stink. Going on the offensive like this just reminds people that they've been downplaying it for over a decade.

If they'd kept their mouths shut, this would be about the terrorists, which would be bad enough. Now it's about the terrorists and the Democrats.

MORE: Best line so far: "War is about killing the enemy and destroying his property. It's not about sitting around in a conference room and coverying your own asses." From 1998.

Clinton looks very bad. So does Sandy Berger.

Massoud: "Are there any men left in Washington, or are they all cowards?"

Madeleine Albright looks pretty bad, too, on the question of informing the Pakistanis that we were trying to kill bin Laden in time for him to get away.

Tenet looks like an ass-coverer. So, so far, I'd say it's pretty accurate . . . .

Upside for Clinton: Osama's jihadis emptying pistols into a TV screen showing him, and shouting "Clinton is Satan!"

FINALLY: I'll try to roundup critiques tomorrow. But I think it was a big mistake for Democrats to draw attention to this film by attacking it and trying to block its broadcast. I wouldn't have watched it without the hype, and I'll be that's true for a lot of people.

Meanwhile, Richard Clarke seems to be ass-covering in the after-show news segment. But George Tenet is getting hammered.
Posted by:Mike

#24  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Jules   2006-09-11 20:33  

#23  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-09-11 19:49  

#22  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JSU   2006-09-11 18:32  

#21  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: mac   2006-09-11 18:10  

#20  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Texas Redneck   2006-09-11 15:29  

#19  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Grunter   2006-09-11 13:23  

#18  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Grunter   2006-09-11 13:20  

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-09-11 12:20  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Dave D.   2006-09-11 11:54  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2006-09-11 11:49  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Dave D.   2006-09-11 11:42  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2006-09-11 11:30  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2006-09-11 11:03  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Steve White   2006-09-11 10:01  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Oldspook   2006-09-11 08:25  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mark Z   2006-09-11 08:04  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-09-11 07:19  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Dave D.   2006-09-11 07:18  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-09-11 07:15  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Zenster   2006-09-11 04:10  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: flyover   2006-09-11 03:19  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2006-09-11 02:21  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-09-11 00:50  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Clereling Cruns6778   2006-09-11 00:10  

00:00