You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
First Source of C.I.A. Leak Admits Role, (Armitage) Lawyer Says
2006-08-30
Richard L. Armitage, a former deputy secretary of state, has acknowledged that he was the person whose conversation with a columnist in 2003 prompted a long, politically laden criminal investigation in what became known as the C.I.A. leak case, a lawyer involved in the case said on Tuesday.

Mr. Armitage did not return calls for comment. But the lawyer and other associates of Mr. Armitage have said he has confirmed that he was the initial and primary source for the columnist, Robert D. Novak, whose column of July 14, 2003, identified Valerie Wilson as a Central Intelligence Agency officer.

The identification of Mr. Armitage as the original leaker to Mr. Novak ends what has been a tantalizing mystery. In recent months, however, Mr. ArmitageÂ’s role had become clear to many, and it was recently reported by Newsweek magazine and The Washington Post.

In the accounts by the lawyer and associates, Mr. Armitage disclosed casually to Mr. Novak that Ms. Wilson worked for the C.I.A. at the end of an interview in his State Department office. Mr. Armitage knew that, the accounts continue, because he had seen a written memorandum by Under Secretary of State Marc Grossman.
Rest at link.
Posted by:ed

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2006-08-30 23:33  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Flump Flenter9237   2006-08-30 23:14  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Remoteman   2006-08-30 23:01  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Captain America   2006-08-30 21:11  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-08-30 20:22  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-08-30 19:38  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-08-30 18:55  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: ed   2006-08-30 18:53  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Jackal   2006-08-30 18:13  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-08-30 17:26  

00:00