You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Blinky Hans Blix: Iran is "certainly not now" developing any bomb
2006-08-22
LONDON (IRNA) -- Former director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Hans Blix says that he is certain Iran is not making a nuclear weapon and believes that the West should restart talks to resolve its desire to enrich uranium.

Now, that makes me feel all warm inside

Iran is "certainly not now" developing any bomb and even the CIA believe that it might take up to 2010 or 2112 to have any capacity, Blix said Tuesday.

"So there is time to talk and that is an important point," he said in an interview with Today, BBC Radio Four's flagship current affairs program. "I think the west should continue talking with Iran," he said.

Blix, who now chairs the Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission, made his call ahead of Iran's expected formal response to a package of incentives being offered by the permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany.

"There is something curious about the offer they made in the spring to come to talks, including with the US which was seen as a big concession, but only if Iran first suspends enrichment," he said.
Hey - just because they were breaking the Non-proliferation Treaty doesn't mean you should be, like, SUSPICIOUS or anything. Shame on you!

The former IAEA director general, who was also the UN's chief arms inspector ahead of the Iraq war, further criticized the Security Council for making the same demand to first suspend in its resolution on July 31.

"They are asking the Iranians really to give up their chief leverage and what should be the chief subject of the negotiations" about resolving the dispute, he said.

During his interview, Blix also believed that it was "not very wise" of both the U.S. and Britain not to rule out military adventurism against Iran.
"There has been too much whipping or threats of whipping all the times," he said, adding that the issue should be about Iran being taken "seriously."
And ponies. Don't forget the ponies. Oh -- and the worldwide Caliphate. Can't forget that one either.
The former chief arms inspector said that he was "doubtful" if Iran felt threatened by its neighbors for any need to develop a nuclear deterrent.
Of course they're not threatened by their neighbors - they plan to dominate and in some cases annex them. And in any case, you've got to keep priorities straight. First, the worldwide conquest by Islam. THEN we talk about who runs things in the Ummah.

"But Iran may be worried about the U.S.," he said. Washington should not up its threats against the Iranians as he believed it may have the opposite effect and "incite them." Asked whether he thought other countries, including Brazil and Japan, who already have uranium enrichment facilities, posed any threat to develop a nuclear weapons, Blix suggested that it depended on "political will."

"Any country with a big industrial capacity in technology could perhaps, but depends if they have the political will," he said, but he added that he did not think either Brazil or Japan had any intentions at the moment.

"What we do not know is if the US continues to develop capacity and there is no disbarment then the atmosphere may change," the former IAEA chief warned as a possibility.
So what Blix really wants is to disarm the US. Interesting he is that open about it -- but then, Ahmadinajad has made it acceptable to say all sorts of things that people once hid.
Posted by:Captain America

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-08-22 22:56  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Zenster   2006-08-22 22:23  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 3dc   2006-08-22 21:59  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: tu3031   2006-08-22 21:53  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: djohn66   2006-08-22 21:21  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Uleagum Shereque4064   2006-08-22 21:20  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: lotp   2006-08-22 20:58  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Captain America   2006-08-22 20:56  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: muck4doo   2006-08-22 20:50  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-08-22 20:45  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: macofromoc   2006-08-22 20:10  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Raj   2006-08-22 19:38  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2006-08-22 19:29  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Rex Mundi   2006-08-22 19:17  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2006-08-22 19:14  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: lotp   2006-08-22 19:13  

00:00