You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Senator Arlen "Iscariot" Specter Preparing To Sue Bush
2006-07-25
A powerful Republican committee chairman who has led the fight against President Bush's signing statements said Monday he would have a bill ready by the end of the week allowing Congress to sue him in federal court.
Hey, way to thank your benefactor, Arlen.
"We will submit legislation to the United States Senate which will...authorize the Congress to undertake judicial review of those signing statements with the view to having the president's acts declared unconstitutional," Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter, R-Pa., said on the Senate floor. Specter's announcement came the same day that an American Bar Association task force concluded that by attaching conditions to legislation, the president has sidestepped his constitutional duty to either sign a bill, veto it, or take no action. Bush has issued at least 750 signing statements during his presidency, reserving the right to revise, interpret or disregard laws on national security and constitutional grounds. "That non-veto hamstrings Congress because Congress cannot respond to a signing statement," said ABA president Michael Greco. The practice, he added "is harming the separation of powers."

Bush has challenged about 750 statutes passed by Congress, according to numbers compiled by Specter's committee. The ABA estimated Bush has issued signing statements on more than 800 statutes, more than all other presidents combined. Signing statements have been used by presidents, typically for such purposes as instructing agencies how to execute new laws. But many of Bush's signing statements serve notice that he believes parts of bills he is signing are unconstitutional or might violate national security.

Still, the White House said signing statements are not intended to allow the administration to ignore the law. "A great many of those signing statements may have little statements about questions about constitutionality," said White House spokesman Tony Snow. "It never says, 'We're not going to enact the law.'"
Posted by:Anonymoose

#21  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Old Patriot   2006-07-25 20:06  

#20  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: eLarson   2006-07-25 21:39  

#19  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Old Patriot   2006-07-25 20:06  

#18  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: KBK   2006-07-25 19:37  

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: eLarson   2006-07-25 16:21  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: USN, ret.   2006-07-25 14:25  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-07-25 12:59  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Inspector Clueso   2006-07-25 12:53  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: texhooey   2006-07-25 12:36  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-07-25 11:29  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2006-07-25 11:27  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: wxjames   2006-07-25 11:08  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Manolo   2006-07-25 11:08  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: The Doctor   2006-07-25 10:23  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 49 Pan   2006-07-25 09:20  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JohnQC   2006-07-25 08:06  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-07-25 07:44  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: cruiser   2006-07-25 02:45  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Iblis   2006-07-25 01:07  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Oldspook   2006-07-25 00:56  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Captain America   2006-07-25 00:32  

00:00