You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
‘French warning of nuclear response a necessary deterrent’
2006-07-05
STRASBOURG: Defence Minister Michele Alliot-Marie said Tuesday the warning by President Jacques Chirac that France could respond with nuclear weapons to state-sponsored terrorism was a necessary deterrent to protect the country from an attack. Chirac warned in January that leaders who would envisage using arms of mass destruction would expose themselves to a “fitting” response - conventional or other - from France. He said there should be no doubt about France’s will and capacity to use nuclear arms if its vital interests were threatened. Alliot-Marie suggested that France would extend its nuclear protection to European allies.

“France is a nuclear power. We have indicated we are willing to strike if one of our neighbors’ existence was threatened. It’s a deterrent, but of course you must be willing to use it for it to be a deterrent,” Alliot-Marie told a European Parliament committee. “Nuclear protection is our protection, the protection we prefer today,” she said. Chirac drew scorching criticism in Europe for his comments, which had sent a warning to countries like Iran and sought to nip in the bud domestic debate about whether deeply indebted France still needs its expensive nuclear deterrent in the post-Cold War world. France’s nuclear arsenal is considered a purely dissuasive means and is not intended for a normal battle situation.
Posted by:Fred

#28  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Rafael   2006-07-05 23:20  

#27  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JohnQC   2006-07-05 22:00  

#26  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: anonymous2u   2006-07-05 21:39  

#25  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Rafael   2006-07-05 18:27  

#24  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: ed   2006-07-05 18:21  

#23  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: mrp   2006-07-05 18:08  

#22  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-07-05 18:00  

#21  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Rafael   2006-07-05 17:51  

#20  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 6   2006-07-05 17:29  

#19  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Secret Master   2006-07-05 16:21  

#18  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-07-05 13:41  

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: anonymous5089   2006-07-05 13:32  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: liberalhawk   2006-07-05 12:08  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Slosing Glemble1381   2006-07-05 10:46  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Angotch Glaising9070   2006-07-05 09:59  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Chuck Simmins   2006-07-05 09:29  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: SR-71   2006-07-05 08:55  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-07-05 08:01  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 2b   2006-07-05 07:38  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: phil_b   2006-07-05 07:09  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-07-05 07:01  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 49 Pan   2006-07-05 06:14  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: lotp   2006-07-05 05:59  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2006-07-05 05:47  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JFM   2006-07-05 04:06  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Howard UK   2006-07-05 03:32  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: muck4doo   2006-07-05 01:56  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-07-05 01:15  

00:00