You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Chemical Weapons Too Degraded to Use - Bigmouth CIA Source
2006-06-23
Iraq chemical weapons too old to use: US intelligence officials

Jun 22 3:12 PM US/Eastern

The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said.

Republican lawmakers have cast the disclosure that about 500 chemical weapons have been found in Iraq as evidence that Saddam Hussein had a stockpile of the weapons before the March 2003 US invasion of Iraq.

But the intelligence officials, who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity, said the weapons were too degraded to have posed a threat to US forces in March 2003.

They said all chemical weapons found since 2003 were produced before the 1991 Gulf War and they had no evidence Saddam was producing or stockpiling chemical weapons after that.

"Generally they are in poor condition," one Clinton holdover official said.

"We assess that they are not in condition to be used as designed. And detailed analysis of the toxic agents shows they are degraded and represent a much lower hazard," he said.

The munitions have been tested and computer simulation models created to determine what effect they might have under a variety of scenarios, the officials said.

Although not suitable for their intended purposed, the officials said such weapons remain a potential hazard if obtained by insurgents and modified in ways they would not discuss.

The officials, however, said they had no evidence that any element of the Iraqi insurgency has possession of chemical weapons.

"I would simply say we have seen a degree of improvisation on the part of the insurgency with regard to conventional munitions," said an official.

"They might apply that same degree of improvisation if in fact they came in contact with these types of munitions. And again we have no evidence that they have," the official said.

The weapons were found "in small numbers over time" since 2003, an official said. They were recovered in one, two or three at a time -- not in large caches, the officials said.

"We would characterize these recovered munitions as being consistent with weapons that have been not maintained, that have not been part of an organized inventory," he said.

Senator Rick Santorum and Representative Peter Hoekstra, both Republicans, on Wednesday made public information from a classified report prepared in April on the subject by the National Ground Intelligence Center that said 500 chemical weapons have been recovered.

The intelligence officials said "key points" from the report were declassified at the request of Hoekstra, who chairs the House Intelligence Committee.

The "key points," however, ommitted the fact that the 500 weapons all were of a pre-1991 vintage. The officials indicated that the age of the weapons was not considered classified but were unable to explain why it was not included in the key points given to the senators.

New Democrat Arguement - The Bush Administration ignored the exiration date on the weapons, or ignored it - Dang those satellite images are good! - Ummmm what do the Dimwitocrats think these are ? Cartons of milk?
Posted by:Kim Jung-il

#22  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-06-23 21:50  

#21  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Oldspook   2006-06-23 21:44  

#20  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: RD   2006-06-23 21:06  

#19  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: RWV   2006-06-23 20:22  

#18  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2006-06-23 20:19  

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Captain America   2006-06-23 20:08  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: GK   2006-06-23 18:52  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Steve White   2006-06-23 18:44  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Glomogum Shogum2997   2006-06-23 18:22  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-06-23 17:40  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Satan66   2006-06-23 17:37  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Slomose Threagum8719   2006-06-23 17:36  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Snise Grogum7151   2006-06-23 17:35  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: liberalhawk   2006-06-23 17:30  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: liberalhawk   2006-06-23 17:25  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: DarthVader   2006-06-23 16:24  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anon   2006-06-23 16:22  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: crosspatch   2006-06-23 16:20  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Thomoque Angereque3714   2006-06-23 16:19  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bobby   2006-06-23 16:15  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-06-23 16:00  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Rex Mundi   2006-06-23 15:58  

00:00