You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Angst Over Arming Robots
2006-06-21
June 21, 2006: Once American infantry got their hands on reliable, and portable, UGVs (unmanned ground vehicles), they did two things. First, they used their small robots as much as possible, especially for dangerous jobs like checking for roadside bombs, or bad guys lurking inside buildings or caves. The second thing the troops did was ask the UGV manufacturer to put weapons on the robots. So far, the Department of Defense has backed away from proposals to arm these MTRS (Man Transportable Robotic System), because of safety concerns. It's not that the armed robots would just be turned on, and turned lose. They would be controlled by their human operator, but there is a reluctance to having the troops equipped with an armed robot. Such systems are more prone to friendly fire incidents. But the troops want them, and the manufacturers of the robots, are spending their own money to develop armed versions of its UGVs.

One of these armed robots is the PakBot, made by iRobot. There are several models of Packbot, but the most popular job for these remote controlled vehicles (that look like a miniature tank, with an extendable arm where the turret should be) is checking out possible roadside bombs, or booby traps, or the insides of caves or buildings believed to hold hostile gunmen. For over a decade, there have been larger (over a hundred pounds) remote control vehicles like this for bomb squads. But better designs, and smaller electronics, have made the man-portable (under 50 pounds) units possible. Two years ago, there were several different MTRS systems in Afghanistan and Iraq, but the iRobot equipment has emerged as the most popular, and most effective. This means troops no longer have to get close to possible bombs, and risk getting blown up when nearby terrorists detonate the device.

But for combat use, PackBot has limitations. Human troops can move a lot faster, and speed is often more important than having an expendable trooper (the robot) in the lead. Armed with a weapon, say a shotgun for opening a locked door, the robot would be more useful. An armed robot would also be more effective when taking the lead in many urban combat situations. Currently, troops continue to find new uses for the unarmed version, like spotting snipers, standing guard and carrying remotely controlled explosives to targets covered by enemy fire. But to be really useful, the troops want armed droids.
Posted by:Steve

#19  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: phil_b   2006-06-21 21:34  

#18  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: remoteman   2006-06-21 16:04  

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: wxjames   2006-06-21 15:53  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: N guard   2006-06-21 15:47  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-06-21 15:18  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: N guard   2006-06-21 13:58  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2006-06-21 13:11  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-06-21 12:57  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-06-21 12:40  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: N guard   2006-06-21 12:37  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Omirong Snumble8439   2006-06-21 12:24  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Cheagum Cleatch4688   2006-06-21 12:18  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: phil_b   2006-06-21 12:16  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2006-06-21 12:03  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Perfesser   2006-06-21 11:28  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mike   2006-06-21 10:50  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: ed   2006-06-21 10:01  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-06-21 09:51  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 3dc   2006-06-21 09:48  

00:00