You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Down Under
Hicks in solitary as 'payback', father says
2006-05-02
David Hicks complained to Australian officials about flea-ridden bedding in his Guantanamo Bay cell just one day before being moved to solitary confinement as payback, his father says.

US military lawyer Major Michael Mori also says his Australian client has been forced to wear the same clothes for three weeks. In an email update on Hicks' condition, Major Mori said Hicks was locked in his cell for 22 hours a day, unable to communicate with anyone, and his clothes smelled. "When I first saw Hicks, his clothes look very dirty and smelled. He said they had not changed his clothes in three weeks," he said.


"David is living in a cement room with a steel door. He cannot communicate with anyone. He is locked in the room for 22 hours a day."
Even my digital sympathy meter doesn't register a twitch. This is no worse than a super-max prison like Marion.
Hicks' father, Terry Hicks, says his son complained of flea-ridden bed linen just a day before being transferred to solitary confinement. "It is quite strange that it was a day after the Australian consular people left him," Mr Hicks said.

Three weeks ago, it was revealed the 30-year-old Australian had been moved to an isolation cell, but Attorney-General Philip Ruddock said at the time this was to accommodate a reduction in detainee numbers at the base.

Mr Hicks says the real reason is more sinister. "It was a stupid comment because where they put him is what they call Camp 5 and that is solitary," he said. "His bedding was flea-ridden. That was part of his major concerns to the Australian consulate ... I still think it's payback."

But Guantanamo Bay commander Colonel Michael Bumgarner has hit back at claims Hicks is being mistreated and is accusing the Australian prisoner of arrogance and an "ill mood". Hicks had refused to hand in his laundry and was always looking for special privileges, he said. "He is not overly cooperative with guards," Colonel Bumgarner told ABC Radio.

"He is a bit arrogant in his demeanour with us, but beyond that he doesn't really incite any type of disturbance.

Col Bumgarner said Hicks could wash his clothes in his cell. "Mr Hicks always sees himself as quite different than any other detainees here. He is always asking for special privileges and extra items beyond that which the other detainees get.
"I'm big heat y'know!"
"It's just in his nature. He is constantly doing that. He likes to have a special menu."

But Hicks was not distressed, he said. "I don't certainly see him as despondent. He is just normally in a very ill mood."
"He's normally just a jerk," he added.
A spokeswoman for Mr Ruddock said the current condition of Hicks's incarceration did not constitute solitary confinement. "(He) is not being held in solitary confinement," the spokeswoman said. "He is being held in a general block area which enables him to continue to have access to exercise and group areas and ... he is able to communicate freely with other detainees."

She said she did not know the exact date Hicks was moved to his current cell but said officials from the Australian Embassy in Washington last visited him on March 16.
Posted by:DepotGuy

#21  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: john   2006-05-02 19:47  

#20  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Grunter   2006-05-02 19:32  

#19  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 6   2006-05-02 18:57  

#18  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-05-02 18:31  

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2006-05-02 17:56  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Capsu 78   2006-05-02 17:27  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: CrazyFool   2006-05-02 16:19  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: OldSpook   2006-05-02 16:02  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: lotp   2006-05-02 14:24  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Rambler   2006-05-02 14:04  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: SPoD   2006-05-02 13:46  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2006-05-02 12:47  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: RD   2006-05-02 12:47  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Raj   2006-05-02 12:01  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-05-02 11:54  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Old Patriot   2006-05-02 11:47  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Darrell   2006-05-02 11:24  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: anonymous5089   2006-05-02 11:09  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2006-05-02 11:07  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: tu3031   2006-05-02 11:03  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2006-05-02 10:59  

00:00