You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
The Most User Friendly Fighter Bomber Ever Built
2006-03-28
March 28, 2006: The Russian air force is buying 24 new Su-34 fighter bombers. This is the latest variant of the Su-27. The Su-34 is somewhat like the American F-15E, a high performance fighter modified to act as a very effective bomber. Aside from it's similarity to the F-15E, the Su-34 has one very distinguishing characteristic. The cockpit for the two man crew not only allows for tandem (side-by-side) seating, but is spacious enough for the pilots to stand up and, standing behind their seats, stretch a bit. There is also a toilet and cooking facilities back there as well. The cockpit itself is protected with 17mm lightweight armor. The canopy does not open, as the pilots enter via a hatch near the front landing gear. The cockpit is pressurized for operations under 33,000 feet (above that, they have to wear the usual flight gear). Although the Su-34 looks like a fighter, it's as heavy as a bomber (44 tons max) and can carry up to eight tons of weapons. It's 77 feet long, with a wingspan of 48 feet. By comparison, the F-15E is 36 tons, 64 feet long and with a 43 foot wingspan.
F-111 is 73 feet, 6 inches (22.0 meters) lond with a wingspan of 63 feet (19 meters) full forward; 31 feet, 11 1/2 inches (11.9 meters) full aft.
An even more lavishly equipped (with sensors) version is in development, to replace the Su-24 (for long range precision bombing.)
Posted by:Steve

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 6   2006-03-28 16:49  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JFM   2006-03-28 16:48  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: USN, ret.   2006-03-28 14:53  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Tibor   2006-03-28 14:52  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: OldSpook   2006-03-28 13:09  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mike   2006-03-28 13:07  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Xbalanke   2006-03-28 12:52  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Xbalanke   2006-03-28 12:50  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Gleaper Jort3500   2006-03-28 12:28  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 6   2006-03-28 12:19  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: RD   2006-03-28 12:00  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: wxjames   2006-03-28 11:23  

00:00