You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Over 500 Scientists Proclaim Their Doubts About Darwin’s Theory
2006-02-21
SEATTLE — Over 500 doctoral scientists have now signed a statement publicly expressing their skepticism about the contemporary theory of Darwinian evolution.

The statement reads: “We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged.”

The list of 514 signatories includes member scientists from the prestigious US and Russian National Academy of Sciences. Signers include 154 biologists, the largest single scientific discipline represented on the list, as well as 76 chemists and 63 physicists. Signers hold doctorates in biological sciences, physics, chemistry, mathematics, medicine, computer science, and related disciplines. Many are professors or researchers at major universities and research institutions such as MIT, The Smithsonian, Cambridge University, UCLA, UC Berkeley, Princeton, the University of Pennsylvania, the Ohio State University, the University of Georgia, and the University of Washington.

Discovery Institute first published its Scientific Dissent From Darwinism list in 2001 to challenge false statements about Darwinian evolution made in promoting PBS’s “Evolution” series. At the time it was claimed that “virtually every scientist in the world believes the theory to be true.”

“Darwinists continue to claim that no serious scientists doubt the theory and yet here are 500 scientists who are willing to make public their skepticism about the theory,” said Dr. John G. West, associate director of Discovery Institute’s Center for Science & Culture. “Darwinist efforts to use the courts, the media and academic tenure committees to suppress dissent and stifle discussion are in fact fueling even more dissent and inspiring more scientists to ask to be added to the list.”

According to West, it was the fast growing number of scientific dissenters which encouraged the Institute to launch a website -- www.dissentfromdarwin.org -- to give the list a permanent home. The website is the Institute’s response to the demand for information and access to the list both by the public, and by scientists who want to add their name to list.

“Darwin’s theory of evolution is the great white elephant of contemporary thought,” said Dr. David Berlinski, one of the original signers, a mathematician and philosopher of science with Discovery Institute’s Center for Science and Culture (CSC). “It is large, almost completely useless, and the object of superstitious awe.”

Posted by:Anonymoose

#51  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-02-21 16:08  

#50  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: bk   2006-02-21 10:34  

#49  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2006-02-21 22:51  

#48  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2006-02-21 22:49  

#47  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: phil_b   2006-02-21 20:52  

#46  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: phil_b   2006-02-21 20:48  

#45  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: gromgoru   2006-02-21 20:31  

#44  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: phil_b   2006-02-21 20:13  

#43  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: lotp   2006-02-21 20:07  

#42  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2006-02-21 20:06  

#41  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Zenster   2006-02-21 20:03  

#40  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: lotp   2006-02-21 19:50  

#39  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: KBK   2006-02-21 19:33  

#38  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: kelly   2006-02-21 18:48  

#37  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: phil_b   2006-02-21 18:45  

#36  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bobby   2006-02-21 18:28  

#35  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: phil_b   2006-02-21 17:47  

#34  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JFM   2006-02-21 16:31  

#33  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-02-21 16:25  

#32  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JFM   2006-02-21 16:19  

#31  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: rjschwarz   2006-02-21 15:59  

#30  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Edward Yee   2006-02-21 14:42  

#29  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Xbalanke   2006-02-21 14:22  

#28  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2006-02-21 13:22  

#27  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: liberalhawk   2006-02-21 13:22  

#26  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Seafarious   2006-02-21 13:19  

#25  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2006-02-21 13:16  

#24  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2006-02-21 13:10  

#23  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-02-21 13:09  

#22  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-02-21 13:05  

#21  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2006-02-21 12:52  

#20  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Zenster   2006-02-21 12:47  

#19  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2006-02-21 12:46  

#18  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: ShepUK   2006-02-21 12:43  

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-02-21 12:39  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Jan   2006-02-21 12:39  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: BA   2006-02-21 12:25  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JFM   2006-02-21 12:09  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-02-21 11:52  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: C-Low   2006-02-21 11:49  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: anonymous5089   2006-02-21 11:45  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: BA   2006-02-21 11:23  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2006-02-21 11:21  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: BA   2006-02-21 11:14  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: C-Low   2006-02-21 10:37  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: danking_70   2006-02-21 10:30  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: mojo   2006-02-21 10:25  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: eLarson   2006-02-21 10:15  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Poitiers-Lepanto   2006-02-21 10:06  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2006-02-21 10:00  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: gromgoru   2006-02-21 09:32  

00:00