You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Russia confirms missile defence contract with Iran
2006-02-09
Amid the escalating crisis around Iran's nuclear programme, Russia said Thursday that it will still arm Tehran with missiles that can secure nuclear facilities from attack.

'We concluded a contract for the supply of air-defence systems to Iran and there is no reason not to fulfil it,' Mikhail Dmitriyev, the head of Russia's military-technical cooperation agency, told journalists in Moscow.

Worth an estimated 700 million dollars, the deal for up to 30 Tor M-1 surface-to-air missiles is the largest since Russia in 2000 withdrew from an agreement with the United States restricting the supply of military hardware to Iran.

Dmitriyev rejected media reports that talks were underway for the additional supply of heavier S-300 air-defence missiles.

Defence Minister Sergei Ivanov has stressed that the Tor is a defensive system and that the sale does not violate Russia's international obligations.

The weapon is effective against aircraft, cruise missiles and guided bombs.

There was no indication when the systems would be shipped to Iran.

The missiles are expected to be deployed at facilities including the nuclear research centre at Isfahan and the reactor that Russia is completing for Iran at the southern port of Bushehr.

According to Dmitriyev, Russia's overall exports of arms in 2005 were worth a record 6.1 billion U.S. dollars. The sales target for 2006 is seven billion dollars, he added.

The main customers for Russian military hardware are China and India.
Posted by:Captain America

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2006-02-09 23:37  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Damn_Proud_American   2006-02-09 23:30  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-02-09 22:00  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Master of Obvious   2006-02-09 21:33  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2006-02-09 21:18  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Darrell   2006-02-09 21:15  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Danking70   2006-02-09 20:14  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2006-02-09 19:59  

00:00