You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Prophet’s statue draws mild rebuke from US Muslim leaders
2006-02-08
Ibrahim's the one with the D-cup on his head. I think I've got it down now.
WASHINGTON: Amid an international outcry over cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad (PTUI peace be upon him), some Muslim leaders have expressed concern about depictions of the Prophet (may toads infest his underwear peace be upon him) at US public buildings, including the Supreme Court.

At the same time, they draw a sharp contrast between the cartoons, which they consider blasphemous and designed to offend, and statues or sculptures meant to honour the Prophet (salaami salaami baloni peace be upon him) as a historical figure and lawgiver. “We have expressed the Muslim community’s concerns about a variety of images of the Prophet Muhammad (may his drip dry clear peace be upon him), whether it be in textbooks, editorial cartoons or even in the Supreme Court,” Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), said.

The sculpture at the country’s top court is part of a marble frieze depicting 18 influential lawgivers, including Moses, Confucius and Charlemagne. The sculpture shows the Prophet (bees pee peace be upon him) holding the Quran in his left hand and a sword in his right. The frieze has adorned the courtroom since the building opened in 1935. Hooper said that CAIR in the past has requested that the sculpture be removed, as Islamic tradition forbids any depictions of the Prophet (may he always make bail peace be upon him). The court, however, turned down the request, saying that altering the frieze would compromise its artistic integrity. “We still have objections for religious reasons but that doesn’t mean we are going to force our views on others,” Hooper said. “We nonetheless have the obligation to raise our concerns with the relevant party.”
Don't have enough people handy to get togther a good riot, huh?
Posted by:Fred

#40  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: wxjames   2006-02-08 22:18  

#39  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Zenster   2006-02-08 22:12  

#38  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-02-08 21:26  

#37  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2006-02-08 20:22  

#36  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: remoteman   2006-02-08 20:14  

#35  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-02-08 19:20  

#34  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Hupomoger Clans9827   2006-02-08 19:17  

#33  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-02-08 19:12  

#32  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Greater Unonter5832   2006-02-08 18:44  

#31  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: radrh8r   2006-02-08 16:56  

#30  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Zenster   2006-02-08 16:52  

#29  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: RD   2006-02-08 16:35  

#28  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mark Z   2006-02-08 16:34  

#27  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Ulimble Shoth9170   2006-02-08 16:20  

#26  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: rjschwarz   2006-02-08 15:08  

#25  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Ding Dangalang   2006-02-08 14:57  

#24  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-02-08 14:28  

#23  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: BA   2006-02-08 14:20  

#22  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Zenster   2006-02-08 14:10  

#21  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Ulimble Shoth9170   2006-02-08 13:16  

#20  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: mmurray821   2006-02-08 13:15  

#19  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Ulimble Shoth9170   2006-02-08 13:14  

#18  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Yosemite Sam   2006-02-08 13:12  

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-02-08 12:47  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Rex Mundi   2006-02-08 12:42  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Rex Mundi   2006-02-08 12:40  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Ominens Thitch4516   2006-02-08 12:39  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Yosemite Sam   2006-02-08 12:26  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2006-02-08 12:16  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: ex-lib   2006-02-08 12:15  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: OldSpook   2006-02-08 12:05  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: OldSpook   2006-02-08 12:01  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Habib-Aziz from Arabia   2006-02-08 11:54  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: GK   2006-02-08 11:19  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Seafarious   2006-02-08 11:04  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-02-08 10:53  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: mojo   2006-02-08 10:42  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Darrell   2006-02-08 10:30  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: BH   2006-02-08 10:03  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2006-02-08 09:52  

00:00