You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
NSA surveillance broader than previously acknowledged
2005-12-24
The National Security Agency has conducted much broader surveillance of e-mails and phone calls — without court orders — than the Bush administration has acknowledged, The New York Times reported on its website.

The NSA, with help from American telecommunications companies, obtained access to streams of domestic and international communications, said the Times in the report late Friday, citing unidentified current and former government officials.

The story did not name the companies.

Since the Times disclosed the domestic spying program last week, President Bush has stressed that his executive order allowing the eavesdropping was limited to people with known links to al-Qaeda.

But the Times said that NSA technicians have combed through large volumes of phone and Internet traffic in search of patterns that might lead to terrorists.

The volume of information harvested from telecommunications data and voice networks, without court-approved warrants, is much larger than the White House has acknowledged, the paper said, quoting an unnamed official.

The story quoted a former technology manager at a major telecommunications firm as saying that companies have been storing information on calling patterns since the Sept. 11 attacks, and giving it to the federal government. Neither the manager nor the company he worked for was identified.
Posted by:Dan Darling

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: phil_b   2005-12-24 19:29  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 49 pan   2005-12-24 14:51  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Glenmore   2005-12-24 14:27  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Unoluck Thuger4056   2005-12-24 13:37  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Oldspook   2005-12-24 13:26  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Darrell   2005-12-24 12:55  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2005-12-24 12:46  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: rjschwarz   2005-12-24 12:01  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Glenmore   2005-12-24 11:41  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2005-12-24 11:41  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: phil_b   2005-12-24 11:30  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Fred   2005-12-24 11:22  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Glenmore   2005-12-24 10:59  

00:00