You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran rejects Russian nuclear compromise
2005-12-06
Iran's insistence on enriching uranium on its own soil amounts to a "unilateral" rejection of a Russian proposal to resolve a nuclear standoff with the West, French Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy said on Monday.

Douste-Blazy is the first senior European minister to publicly express dismay at the negotiating stance of the Iranians, ahead of fresh talks expected later this month.

Iran has said its nuclear program will enrich uranium only to a level suitable for civilian atomic-power reactors, but the United States and European Union fear Tehran will use the same technology to make bomb-grade material.

To minimize that possibility, Moscow proposes taking in Iranian uranium for enrichment and then returning it to Iran. But Tehran has said it will only accept proposals that allow it to conduct a full nuclear fuel cycle at home.

"The Russians have made a proposal to Iran for the possibility of a joint venture for enriching nuclear material for Iran. But the Iranians, in a way, have unilaterally refused this," Douste-Blazy told reporters during an Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) meeting in Slovenia.

"The Europeans wish to give time to negotiations so as to show the Iranians that what we precisely want is to achieve something through negotiations," he said. "We are not trying to humiliate them. But so far Iran has said 'no' to everything."

The Islamic Republic rejects suspicions that it is bent on making atomic bombs. It says its nuclear project aims solely to generate electricity. But Iran hid its nuclear work from U.N. inspectors for 18 years until 2003, raising alarm in the West.

Talks between Iran and the EU trio of Britain, Germany and France spearheading diplomatic efforts to defuse the crisis are to resume within weeks, diplomats say, but differences over the agenda appear to be holding things up.

The EU3-Iran dialogue broke down in August when Iran removed U.N. seals at its Isfahan nuclear facility and began processing uranium, the stage prior to uranium enrichment.

"We want to give every chance for negotiations. We have done all our utmost to resume negotiations and bring them (Iran) back within the international community," Douste-Blazy said.

Ali Larijani, Iran's chief nuclear negotiator, told Reuters on Sunday that Tehran's patience regarding Western opposition to its nuclear program was wearing thin and it would give the EU only a few months to settle the matter through talks.

On Monday, Larijani said Iran would invite bidders to tender for construction of two 1,000-megawatt nuclear reactors, signaling Tehran would sally forth with plans to establish a large-scale nuclear industry despite Western opposition.

The announcement, which did not give a time frame for the tenders or construction, came on the heels of news on Sunday that the government had approved construction of a locally built reactor in the province of Khuzestan.

The U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), decided at a board meeting last month to put off a vote on referring Iran for possible U.N. sanctions in favor of giving time for Russian diplomacy to bear fruit.

But Western powers on the board also warned their patience was limited, citing a September board resolution finding Iran in non-compliance with safeguards provisions of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, to which Tehran is a signatory.
Posted by:Dan Darling

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2005-12-06 21:20  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2005-12-06 20:55  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Flerert Whese8274   2005-12-06 20:49  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Zenster   2005-12-06 20:48  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Steve White   2005-12-06 19:12  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2005-12-06 17:51  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Old Patriot   2005-12-06 17:09  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Hyper   2005-12-06 16:28  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Zenster   2005-12-06 14:43  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Canuck   2005-12-06 11:53  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: dushan   2005-12-06 10:32  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Captain America   2005-12-06 09:03  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Elmineger Elmoluque4082   2005-12-06 08:48  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: SR-71   2005-12-06 08:04  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Dave D.   2005-12-06 08:04  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 2b   2005-12-06 07:00  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2005-12-06 05:51  

00:00