You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Fifth Column
CNN Senior Management Launches Investigation Of Cheney 'X'
2005-11-22
*Exclusive**

CNN management has launched an internal investigation into how a giant black 'X' mark appeared over Vice President Dick Cheney's face -- as he delivered a speech from Washington on Monday! "We are taking this matter very, very seriously, and I can assure you no one at this network would ever deliberately place an 'X' over the vice president's face," a top CNN source, who asked not to be named at this time, said from New York.

A well-placed CNN insider claims a control room staffer "laughed" when the image appeared shortly after 11 am. A careful review of the tape now shows a white colored 'X' was also transposed over Cheney's face during the speech, it appeared for less than 1/15 of a second, creating a startling flash effect.
Someone was messing around, having a laugh with his buddies in the control room, and mistakenly put it on the "Program" bus instead of "Preview". Fecal matter then hit rotary air circulation device.

CNN spokeswoman Laurie Goldberg emails: "We concluded this was a technological malfunction not an issue of operator error. A portion of the switcher experienced a momentary glitch. We obviously regret that it happened and are working on the equipment to ensure it is not repeated."
Yeah, right. Equipment error.
A rival network news director asks: "When has an 'X' ever aired on CNN before? Who had the graphic sitting in the key signal? Who generated the 'X'?"
What he said
The vice president himself is said to have brushed off the incident, a White House source said early Tuesday morning.

Developing
...
Michelle Malkin is all over this story, with lots of links and informed commentary, including this guy who sez it's a glitch.
Posted by:Steve

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Johnnie Bartlette   2005-11-22 19:29  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Besoeker   2005-11-22 18:38  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Shipman   2005-11-22 13:14  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: docob   2005-11-22 11:37  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Matt   2005-11-22 11:30  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Curt Simon   2005-11-22 11:04  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Chans Uleter9492   2005-11-22 10:25  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Whating Elmeath2891   2005-11-22 10:07  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: bk   2005-11-22 10:06  

00:00