You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Israel-Palestine-Jordan
Medics condemn Gaza sonic booms
2005-11-03
Doctors' groups have filed a petition at the Israeli Supreme Court seeking to halt air force jets from breaking the sound barrier over the Gaza Strip. The UN says the tactic is an abuse of human rights, causing widespread fear especially among children, and medics say it induces miscarriages. The sonic booms from Israeli jets are designed to be a show of force to militant groups, correspondents say. Israel evacuated its settlers and troops from Gaza earlier this year. However, the Jewish state continues to control the territory's airspace, coastline and borders. It has also continued to carry out air raids against what it says are militant targets.

The joint Israeli-Palestinian petition filed in the Supreme Court by the Gaza Community Mental Health Programme and Physicians for Human Rights-Israel says that according to international law, "the booms are collective punishment against the civilian population and thus illegal".
What about the "booms" on Israeli buses?
The head of the Gaza group, Dr Eyad Sarraj, a psychiatrist, has said that the sonic booms are having serious effects on children in Gaza, including anxiety, panic, fear, poor concentration and low academic success. He also reports that the number of miscarriages among pregnant women increase during periods of frequent sonic booms.

The United Nations spokesman in Gaza, Khaled Abdul Shafi, said: "We at the United Nations have already submitted a letter of protest to the Israeli government urging them to stop... the sonic booming and the air raids immediately, because we simply think that this is a violation of basic human rights, especially rights of children to live in peace and to be educated in peace." The Israeli military declined to comment.
I think I'll decline to give a f**k as well
"Because the subject is before the Supreme Court, the response will be given in that framework," the army spokesman's office said.
Posted by:Steve

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Phil   2005-11-03 18:25  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Jiger Omemp7875   2005-11-03 16:49  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Old Patriot   2005-11-03 16:48  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2005-11-03 15:20  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Zenster   2005-11-03 14:08  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: liberalhawk   2005-11-03 12:59  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Besoeker   2005-11-03 11:33  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-11-03 10:58  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: djohn66   2005-11-03 10:44  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2005-11-03 09:51  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Snuling Ebbains7645   2005-11-03 09:33  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: IAF   2005-11-03 09:24  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-11-03 09:17  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: SteveS   2005-11-03 09:09  

00:00