You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
'Able Danger' Officer's Clearance Revoked
2005-09-30
An officer who has claimed that a classified military unit identified four Sept. 11 hijackers before the 2001 attacks is facing Pentagon accusations of breaking numerous rules, allegations his lawyer suggests are aimed at undermining his credibility. The alleged infractions by Army Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, 42, include obtaining a service medal under false pretenses, improperly flashing military identification while drunk and stealing pens, according to military paperwork shown by his attorney to The Associated Press. Shaffer was one of the first to publicly link Sept. 11 leader Mohamed Atta to the unit code-named Able Danger. Shaffer was one of five witnesses the Pentagon ordered not to appear Sept. 21 before the Senate Judiciary Committee to discuss the unit's findings.

The military revoked Shaffer's top security clearance this month, a day before he was supposed to testify to a congressional committee. Mark Zaid, Shaffer's attorney, said the Pentagon started looking into Shaffer's security clearance about the time in 2003 he met in Afghanistan with staff members of the bipartisan commission that studied the Sept. 11 attacks and told them about Able Danger. Zaid said he can't prove the Pentagon went after Shaffer because he's a whistleblower, but "all the timing associated with the clearance issue has been suspiciously coincidental."

Citing concerns with the privacy act, Cmdr. Terry Sutherland, a Defense Intelligence Agency spokesman, declined to release any information on Shaffer.
...more...
Posted by:.com

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Glaitch Sheash2949   2005-09-30 18:50  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: rkb   2005-09-30 17:59  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: eLarson   2005-09-30 17:23  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: phil_b   2005-09-30 16:14  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: wrinkleneck_trout   2005-09-30 12:22  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Hupinemble Thomoger2928   2005-09-30 11:57  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: DepotGuy   2005-09-30 11:50  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-09-30 11:05  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-09-30 10:06  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: SwissTex   2005-09-30 09:51  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: lotp   2005-09-30 09:45  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: lotp   2005-09-30 09:31  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Hupinemble Thomoger2928   2005-09-30 09:23  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: eLarson   2005-09-30 08:24  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: ed   2005-09-30 06:46  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: jolly roger   2005-09-30 06:29  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 2b   2005-09-30 04:49  

00:00