You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Judge Tosses Bid to Revive Reparation Suit
2005-07-07
This suit had big play in the Chicago papers. As we say around here, "they could smell the meat a-cookin'."
CHICAGO (AP) - An effort by slave descendants to gain reparations from corporations that allegedly benefited from slavery was dismissed Wednesday by a federal judge.

Judge Charles R. Norgle characterized the issue as basically political, and said it should be decided by the legislative or executive branch. He added that the plaintiffs have failed to show a link between themselves and the 17 corporations named as defendants, and that the statute of limitations rules out damages for wrongs committed before slavery was abolished in 1868.

It was the second time Norgle dismissed a version of the slave reparations suit and this time he did it with prejudice - meaning that any hopes of reviving it at the District Court level most likely are dead.
Nah, it's like Rasputin -- it will keep coming back one way or another.
Norgle based his decision partly on ``the long-standing'' doctrine that political issues should be resolved in the Congress or the executive branch, and noted that slavery reparations issues historically have been fought there rather than the courts.

Attorney Benjamin Obi Nwoye said he and other lawyers who have worked on the suit planned to appeal. ``We don't agree with his reasoning,'' he said. ``We are hopeful that we will get justices who are fair-minded so the descendants of slaves can be repaid for the work of their forefathers.'' Attorneys for the slave descendants say they want to use any damages to create a fund to feather their own nests help correct problems in the black community.
Posted by:Steve White

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: LC FOTSGreg   2005-07-07 19:21  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: mmurray821   2005-07-07 10:11  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2005-07-07 10:10  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2005-07-07 09:58  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: BA   2005-07-07 09:46  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: tu3031   2005-07-07 09:42  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Tkat   2005-07-07 09:36  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Hupavising Slomosing7791   2005-07-07 09:28  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2005-07-07 01:23  

00:01