This is my letter submitted to the editors of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette in reference to the linked story above.
How ironic that, immediately following the Supreme Court's decision on the Kelo case, an original copy of the Bill of Rights will be displayed here in Pittsburgh. I assume it is purely for entertainment and nostalgia value, as the Supreme Court has once again displayed their contempt for the original document, particularly the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause.
To any reader who views the document, I request that you verify the clause "nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation," is not followed by "or for private development by someone richer, prettier, and more socially acceptable than you!" as the Supremes have interpreted it.
I'd address the Second Amendment as well, but I don't have the space or time for that rant. |