You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
SKors upset about US criticism of NKors
2005-06-22
SEOUL - South Korean Foreign Minister Ban Ki-Moon expressed regret on Tuesday at recurring US criticism of North Korea, saying the comments are unhelful in the current reconciliatory mood.
Stockholm syndrome is getting worse.
Seoul is seeking to build on optimism sparked by North Korean leader Kim Jong-Il’s remarks last week -- that his communist state might return to six-party talks on its nuclear weapons programme as early as July if the United States “acknowledges and respects” it as a dialogue partner.

At a seminar hosted by the Hudson Institute on Monday, US Undersecretary for Global Affairs Paula Dobriansky repeated Washington’s definition of North Korea as an outpost of tyranny alongside Myanmar, Zimbabwe and Cuba, according to reports here. “It is not helpful for the current reconciliatory mood that a senior US official called North Korea an outpost of tyranny,” Ban was quoted as telling Yonhap news agency. “I find it regrettable.”
"Mr. Ban, this is our new UN ambassador, Mr. Bolton ..."
An unidentified senior official at the presidential Blue House also said such remarks, although made in an unofficial setting, were unhelpful. “Undersecretary Dobriansky reportedly called the North an outpost of tyranny. We think this kind of remarks though true will not help international efforts to have the six-party talks resumed since our crazy cousins to the north are mighty petulant,” he said.

A high-level North Korean delegation arrived in Seoul Tuesday for four days of inter-Korean talks, during which Seoul hopes Pyongyang will set a date for its return to the talks involving the two Koreas, host China, the United States, Japan and Russia. They aim to persuade North Korea to end its nuclear weapons drive in return for security guarantees and economic benefits. North Korea has cited hostile US policy as its reason for refusing to return to the discussions.
And we're going to keep being hostile.
Posted by:Steve White

#36  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-06-22 21:25  

#35  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-06-22 19:59  

#34  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-06-22 19:05  

#33  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: OldSpook   2005-06-22 18:23  

#32  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: anonymous2u   2005-06-22 13:28  

#31  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: anonymous2u   2005-06-22 13:21  

#30  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: trailing wife   2005-06-22 12:29  

#29  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: too true   2005-06-22 12:14  

#28  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Tom   2005-06-22 11:21  

#27  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-06-22 11:14  

#26  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-06-22 11:03  

#25  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Omuse Sneatch5591   2005-06-22 10:55  

#24  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2005-06-22 10:43  

#23  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Steve White   2005-06-22 10:41  

#22  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-06-22 09:42  

#21  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Tkat   2005-06-22 09:33  

#20  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Fun Dung Poo   2005-06-22 09:21  

#19  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-06-22 09:13  

#18  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Jackal   2005-06-22 09:12  

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: raptor   2005-06-22 08:28  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: mhw   2005-06-22 08:15  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 2b   2005-06-22 07:35  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Leading Husband   2005-06-22 07:29  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 2b   2005-06-22 07:25  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: trailing wife   2005-06-22 03:53  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: OldSpook   2005-06-22 02:40  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-06-22 02:21  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Desert Blondie   2005-06-22 02:19  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Sock Puppet 0’ Doom   2005-06-22 01:50  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: ed   2005-06-22 01:45  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Jennie Taliaferro   2005-06-22 01:04  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: NotMikeMoore   2005-06-22 01:00  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Steve White   2005-06-22 00:50  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: NotMikeMoore   2005-06-22 00:48  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Steve White   2005-06-22 00:15  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: NotMikeMoore   2005-06-22 00:09  

00:00