You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Home Front: WoT
WTC conspiracy nuts not restricted to Europe anymore.
2005-06-15
A former Bush team member during his first administration is now voicing serious doubts about the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9-11.So, you want to run for public office, get a rational platform. Former chief economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds comments that the official story about the collapse of the WTC is "bogus" and that it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7.Uh, yeah. What about all the camera crews that filmed live coverage of the jets slamming into the towers? Reynolds, who also served as director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis Policy Analysis, now we have our axe to be ground in Dallas and is now professor emeritus at Texas A&M University said, "If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling."A case for you being dangerously insane would also be compelling Morgan Reynolds commented from his Texas A&M office, "It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate debate? I'm debating wether you are retarded or just purposely trying to make a mockery of our nations worst tradjedy of my lifetime. over the cause of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7. If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely to be correct either. The government's collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings."
Except for the fact that: all this took place live, in front of an audience of millions, OBL admitted to planning it, there were no explosions after the planes hit, and the reasons given for the collapse seem perfectly plausible to anyone with a brainstem
But you're probably right dickweed, it's a big cover up. Why don't you move to Germany or better yet Iran .
Oh, and since I'm bitchin, look where the story came from.
Posted by:bigjim-ky

#47  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Phil Fraering   2005-06-16 00:03  

#46  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Rory B. Bellows   2005-06-15 23:43  

#45  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2005-06-15 23:25  

#44  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2005-06-15 23:23  

#43  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Rory B. Bellows   2005-06-15 23:16  

#42  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: OldSpook   2005-06-15 23:13  

#41  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2005-06-15 23:11  

#40  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2005-06-15 23:04  

#39  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2005-06-15 22:52  

#38  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2005-06-15 22:48  

#37  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2005-06-15 22:34  

#36  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Rory B. Bellows   2005-06-15 22:28  

#35  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Rory B. Bellows   2005-06-15 22:24  

#34  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2005-06-15 22:22  

#33  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Rory B. Bellows   2005-06-15 22:17  

#32  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-06-15 22:01  

#31  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2005-06-15 21:33  

#30  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2005-06-15 21:09  

#29  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Rory B. Bellows   2005-06-15 21:09  

#28  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2005-06-15 20:55  

#27  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-06-15 20:42  

#26  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2005-06-15 20:40  

#25  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2005-06-15 20:18  

#24  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2005-06-15 20:16  

#23  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2005-06-15 20:14  

#22  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Phil Fraering   2005-06-15 20:08  

#21  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: too true   2005-06-15 19:59  

#20  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2005-06-15 19:12  

#19  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Scott R   2005-06-15 18:11  

#18  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Shipman   2005-06-15 18:00  

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Phil Fraering   2005-06-15 14:03  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: ed   2005-06-15 13:24  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: FeralCat   2005-06-15 13:05  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: anon1   2005-06-15 12:59  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: rkb   2005-06-15 12:59  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: anon1   2005-06-15 12:57  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bobby   2005-06-15 12:23  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2005-06-15 09:53  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: RJSchwarz   2005-06-15 09:41  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: VAMark   2005-06-15 09:27  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Tkat   2005-06-15 09:23  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Cheaderhead   2005-06-15 09:22  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Steve   2005-06-15 09:14  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: trailing wife   2005-06-15 08:59  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 2b   2005-06-15 08:49  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JerseyMike   2005-06-15 08:43  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Steve   2005-06-15 08:35  

00:00