You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
U.S. Intel: Plutonium sent by Norks this year makes Iran direct threat
2005-06-02
From Geostrategy-Direct, subscription req'd. I would like to see some verification of this claim, as it is very serious.
U.S. intelligence officials have told President Bush news that has left him stunned: Iran has completed all of the elements required for an atomic bomb. The intelligence information asserted that North Korea this year transferred components to Iran to assemble a plutonium-based nuclear warhead. The components were believed to have originated in Pakistan.
The new Axis of Evil Schizophrenics
The development suggests Iran now has the capability to launch a missile tipped with a nuclear warhead.
That will put Israel on a hair trigger. The distances between Iran and Israel are too short. Israel has to assume a nuclear attack if they detect an MMM (Mad Mullah Missile).
I'd be careful with the weather balloons around there ...
"It's an incredible piece of intelligence that overshadows everything we thought we knew on Iran's nuclear program," one U.S. intelligence source said.
The data we have on Iran's nuclear program shouldn't be that fragile. If it is, we're doing something seriously wrong, which would probably be relying too much on HUMINT.
For the last two years, the CIA has been tracking Iran's efforts to enrich sufficient uranium for a nuclear warhead. All of the CIA's assessments on Iran's nuclear weapons program were based on how much technology and enriched uranium Iran had obtained for its first nuclear warhead. The CIA, while dismayed by Iranian efforts, was confident that Teheran needed at least another three years to assemble a nuclear bomb.
They went down several routes, including the Kahn™ turnkey route, IMHO.
Instead, the entire Iranian uranium enrichment effort appears to have concealed a much more immediate aim. The clerical regime in Teheran did not plan to wait several years for a nuclear option and obtained plutonium and components from North Korea. In late 2004, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps tested a command and control network that would permit a nuclear weapons warhead to be placed on an enhanced Shihab-3 intermediate-range missile. How many nuclear warheads could Iran produce immediately? The CIA has learned that Iran could assemble several nuclear warheads for the Shihab-3 arsenal. This means that U.S. forces in Iraq and southern Europe are under immediate Iranian threat. Israel and Saudi Arabia are already under Iranian nuclear threat.
Everyone is under the threat, including the EUniks, welcome to the club.
In 1994, the CIA obtained the first reports of Iran obtaining plutonium components from North Korea. But the latest information comes from a new and far more reliable source. Intelligence sources won't elaborate, but stress that the source is from a "hostile" state, a reference to either Iran or North Korea.
Maybe a Nork or even an Iranian mole?
Posted by:Alaska Paul

#20  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: john   2005-06-02 19:44  

#19  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Shipman   2005-06-02 19:05  

#18  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: john   2005-06-02 17:38  

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: DO   2005-06-02 17:02  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: john   2005-06-02 16:40  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: john   2005-06-02 16:29  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: BrerRabbit   2005-06-02 16:17  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: john   2005-06-02 16:16  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2005-06-02 16:02  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Angie Schultz   2005-06-02 14:10  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JFM   2005-06-02 13:56  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Shipman   2005-06-02 12:30  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Valentine   2005-06-02 12:01  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: john   2005-06-02 08:50  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Glotle Flomons5456   2005-06-02 08:00  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2005-06-02 07:14  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 2b   2005-06-02 02:05  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: someone   2005-06-02 00:49  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: DO   2005-06-02 00:48  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: mmurray821   2005-06-02 00:09  

00:00