You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran threat: Attack by West risks all 'Middle East oil'
2005-03-03
Iran has warned that Gulf Arab oil would be endangered by any U.S. attack on the Islamic republic. In the first such threat, a leading Iranian official raised the prospect of Iranian retaliation against Middle East oil exports. The official said such Gulf Cooperation Council oil states as Kuwait and Saudi Arabia could be threatened. "An attack on Iran will be tantamount to endangering Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and — in a word — the entire Middle East oil," Iranian Expediency Council secretary Mohsen Rezai said on Tuesday.
About 40 percent of the world's crude oil shipments passes through the two-mile wide channel of the strategic Straits of Hormuz. Iranian forces are deployed at the head of the channel. Oman and the United Arab Emirates are located on the other side. Teheran could easily block the Straits of Hormuz and use its missiles to strike tankers and GCC oil facilities, according to the new edition of Geostrategy-Direct.com. Within weeks, the rest of the world would be starving for oil and the global economy could be in danger.
The U.S. Energy Information Administration projects that oil tanker traffic through the Straits of Hormuz will rise to about 60 percent of global oil exports by 2025.
Rezai, a former commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps and a candidate for president, told the Fars News Agency that any Western attack on Iran would send oil prices rocketing to $70 per barrel. He said such a significant increase in oil prices would also be sparked by international sanctions on Teheran.
Posted by:Steve

#23  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-03-03 11:05:36 PM  

#22  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-03-03 9:10:51 PM  

#21  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: True German Ally   2005-03-03 9:02:23 PM  

#20  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Tom Dooley   2005-03-03 8:52:41 PM  

#19  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: trailing wife   2005-03-03 8:43:17 PM  

#18  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: BrerRabbit   2005-03-03 7:54:00 PM  

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2005-03-03 7:51:33 PM  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-03-03 7:49:55 PM  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Sobiesky   2005-03-03 7:46:33 PM  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: BigEd   2005-03-03 7:19:03 PM  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Classical_Liberal   2005-03-03 7:15:31 PM  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Hyper   2005-03-03 6:55:37 PM  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: half   2005-03-03 6:54:34 PM  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2005-03-03 6:43:31 PM  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: RWV   2005-03-03 6:13:20 PM  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-03-03 5:32:00 PM  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Seafarious   2005-03-03 5:31:24 PM  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Laurence of the Rats   2005-03-03 5:22:58 PM  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: phil_b   2005-03-03 5:21:17 PM  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: anonymous2u   2005-03-03 4:58:20 PM  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Cleamp Ebbererong2543   2005-03-03 4:54:56 PM  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: anonymous2u   2005-03-03 4:48:19 PM  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bobby   2005-03-03 4:42:38 PM  

00:00