You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
China charges U.S. monopolizes the Internet, seeks global control
2005-03-02
China's ambassador to the United Nations last week called for international controls on the Internet.

Chinese Ambassador Sha Zukang told a UN conference that controls should be multilateral, transparent and democratic, with the full involvement of governments, the private sector, civil society and international organizations.
just like China?
"It should ensure an equitable distribution of resources, facilitate access for all and ensure a stable and secure functioning," he said at the conference on Internet governance.

Sha said China opposes the "monopolization" of the Internet by one state, a reference to the Untied States, which ultimately controls the digital medium.

"It is of crucial importance to conduct research on establishing a multilateral governance mechanism that is more rational and just and more conducive to the Internet development in a direction of stable, secure and responsible functioning and more conducive to the continuous technological innovation," he said.
Now why would they be so fearful?
China's communist government fears the Internet would dilute Beijing's control over its population, as information passes unfiltered throughout the country and outside of strict government censorship. China strictly prohibits any public criticism of the ruling communist party and closely monitors and censors Internet usage. Periodically, Chinese security forces raid Internet cafes and arrest people who violate Chinese rules.
BINGO!
Sha said China has 94 million Internet users out of a worldwide total of about 810 million.
Free flow of information and economic power will be the downfall of China and other despots

Posted by:Frank G

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Classical_Liberal   2005-03-02 10:22:30 PM  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Sobiesky   2005-03-02 9:50:30 PM  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Thraing Hupoluper1864   2005-03-02 5:28:19 PM  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Yosemite Sam   2005-03-02 5:26:12 PM  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Spot   2005-03-02 5:15:54 PM  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: GK   2005-03-02 5:04:07 PM  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2005-03-02 4:43:54 PM  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2005-03-02 4:40:19 PM  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: mmurray821   2005-03-02 4:34:59 PM  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-03-02 4:31:36 PM  

00:00