You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Russia to sign nuclear fuel deal with Iran
2005-02-10
MOSCOW - The Russian atomic energy agency said on Thursday it would sign a key agreement with Iran on the return of nuclear fuel later this month that would complete Moscow's construction of the Islamic state's first nuclear power plant.

The ITAR-TASS news agency quoted the agency's spokesman Nikolai Shingaryov as saying that the elusive agreement, which has been delayed for over a year, would be signed during atomic energy chief Alexander Rumyantsev visit's to Iran scheduled for February 25-27. "We plan to sign, in Tehran, an additional protocol on the return of spent nuclear fuel to Russia," the spokesman was quoted as saying.
Oh yeah, I'm sure it'll all be accounted for in the end.
The fuel's return has remained the key impediment to the 800 million dollar Bushehr project. Russia and the West both fear that Iran could reprocess the spent fuel delivered from Russia by upgrading it through centrifuges to either make a weak "dirty bomb" or an actual nuclear weapon.
Russia fears this? News to me.
Tehran has in the past used various arguments to avoid signing the agreement. It has said the material was too volatile and dangerous to transport back to Russia and also that Moscow was charging too much for the fuel itself.

The United States and Israel had jointly launched an international campaign against Russia's Bushehr project but Moscow has countered that it would make sure the plant remained harmless to protect its own security interests.
And if you can't trust Vladimir Putin, who can you trust?
Posted by:Steve White

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Shaiter Thrutle8631   2005-02-10 4:45:59 PM  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Shaiter Thrutle8631 TROLL   2005-02-10 4:45:59 PM  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Sobiesky   2005-02-10 4:21:35 PM  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Zpaz   2005-02-10 4:12:50 PM  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: ed   2005-02-10 4:04:28 PM  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Zpaz   2005-02-10 4:03:47 PM  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Dreadnought   2005-02-10 3:55:08 PM  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: ed   2005-02-10 3:49:45 PM  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: ed   2005-02-10 3:39:15 PM  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Zpaz   2005-02-10 3:33:05 PM  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2005-02-10 3:31:08 PM  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: ed   2005-02-10 3:13:14 PM  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Sobiesky   2005-02-10 2:59:55 PM  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: ed   2005-02-10 2:52:47 PM  

00:00