You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran Would Accelerate Nuke Program if Attacked; Says it Can't be Disuaded from Development
2005-02-06
Iran would both retaliate and accelerate its drive to master nuclear technology if the United States or Israel attacked its atomic facilities, Iran's chief nuclear negotiator warned on Sunday. Hassan Rohani, secretary-general of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, also told Reuters there was nothing the West could offer Tehran that would persuade it to scrap a nuclear program which Washington fears may be used to make bombs. Asked about a possible attack by the United States or Israel, which have both said a nuclear-armed Iran would be unacceptable, Rohani said: "If such an attack (against Iran's atomic facilities) takes place then of course we will retaliate and we will definitely accelerate our activities to complete our (nuclear) fuel cycle." Speaking in a rare interview, Rohani said Iran's ability to produce its own nuclear parts had made it "invulnerable" to attack since it could simply rebuild whatever was destroyed.
And so on, ad infinitum

"But I do not think the United States itself will take such a risk ... They know our capabilities for retaliating against such attacks," the mid-ranking cleric added.
"We're protected by Allan!"

Rohani said even the removal of U.S. sanctions on Iran or security guarantees from Washington would not be enough to tempt Tehran to give up its nuclear drive. "Uranium enrichment is Iran's right, based on the NPT's (nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty's) article four ... I do not think anyone in Iran would exchange or swap this right for anything else."

EU diplomats have voiced frustration at Iran's refusal to give way on what it calls its "red line" -- developing a full nuclear fuel cycle -- saying Tehran's stance is "unacceptable." Rohani complained the EU talks, due to resume in Geneva this week, have yet to result in anything concrete thus far. "Our expectations were higher. We believe the Europeans should be more serious," he said. Rohani said Iran would review progress in the talks in mid-March before taking any decision on whether to resume uranium enrichment which it froze in November. "If we witness considerable progress in the talks our patience will increase, if we observe no progress, it will shorten our patience. But, as I have said before, the period of (enrichment) suspension is limited to some months, not a year."

EU diplomats in Vienna have told Reuters Iran is breaking the spirit of its agreement to freeze enrichment by conducting quality control checks of enrichment centrifuge parts. But Rohani insisted Iran was sticking to the deal it made with the EU in Paris last November. "We are fully committed to whatever we have agreed with the Europeans ... I can tell you that we have not contradicted the Paris agreement at all," he said.
Could Iran's playing of the EU-3 for suckers be any more obvious?
Posted by:Bulldog

#38  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: True German Ally   2005-02-06 11:57:31 PM  

#37  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: phil_b   2005-02-06 11:37:07 PM  

#36  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-02-06 10:57:04 PM  

#35  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JP   2005-02-06 10:53:28 PM  

#34  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2005-02-06 9:28:17 PM  

#33  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2005-02-06 9:24:52 PM  

#32  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-02-06 9:22:31 PM  

#31  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: True German Ally   2005-02-06 9:08:55 PM  

#30  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2005-02-06 9:06:35 PM  

#29  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JP   2005-02-06 9:01:57 PM  

#28  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: True German Ally   2005-02-06 8:27:56 PM  

#27  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: True German Ally   2005-02-06 8:23:37 PM  

#26  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Dave D.   2005-02-06 8:23:32 PM  

#25  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: phil_b   2005-02-06 8:23:23 PM  

#24  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-02-06 8:18:59 PM  

#23  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2005-02-06 8:18:34 PM  

#22  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-02-06 8:17:52 PM  

#21  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: True German Ally   2005-02-06 8:16:03 PM  

#20  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2005-02-06 7:49:57 PM  

#19  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: phil_b   2005-02-06 7:33:47 PM  

#18  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2005-02-06 7:17:10 PM  

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-02-06 7:13:09 PM  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2005-02-06 7:02:25 PM  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: phil_b   2005-02-06 6:56:04 PM  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: too true   2005-02-06 6:53:06 PM  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Dave D.   2005-02-06 6:52:29 PM  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-02-06 6:52:18 PM  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: True German Ally   2005-02-06 6:39:15 PM  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Dave D.   2005-02-06 6:24:38 PM  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2005-02-06 6:12:36 PM  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: too true   2005-02-06 6:01:17 PM  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JerseyMike   2005-02-06 5:54:42 PM  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2005-02-06 5:36:49 PM  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anonymoose   2005-02-06 4:51:51 PM  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Poison Reverse   2005-02-06 3:27:12 PM  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Tom   2005-02-06 2:17:09 PM  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JerseyMike   2005-02-06 2:05:42 PM  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2005-02-06 1:37:33 PM  

00:00