You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Old Chinese Warships Converted to Fast Transports
2005-01-03
January 2, 2005: China is converting older frigates and destroyers to APDs (fast transports). At the rate the conversions are going, China will soon have at least eight APDs. The first to be converted are the Jianghu class frigates, which were built in the 1970s and are now being retired. To create an APD, most weapons are removed from these frigates, with the now empty spaces modified to transport cargo or troops. The 1,800 ton Jianghu's have a top speed of about 46 kilometers an hour. This enables APDs to move quickly, especially during darkness, to reach their destination.
Gonna try to run the "Slot" to Taiwan, are you now?
Shorter travel time makes the APDs less vulnerable to attack (and easier to defend, especially if you have to keep fighters overhead.) Taiwan is 300 kilometers from the Chinese coast. Each APD could carry several hundred troops, or a few hundred tons of cargo.
Looks like they really want to have a go at taking a beach under fire. Say hello to Chairman Mao for me when you get to hell.
Posted by:Steve

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Weird Al   2005-01-03 5:54:47 PM  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Cheaderhead   2005-01-03 5:10:13 PM  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Shipman   2005-01-03 3:44:27 PM  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Chuck Simmins   2005-01-03 2:10:04 PM  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Shipman   2005-01-03 2:08:13 PM  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Steve   2005-01-03 2:02:09 PM  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-01-03 1:58:59 PM  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: mojo   2005-01-03 12:36:34 PM  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: z man   2005-01-03 12:21:34 PM  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anonymoose   2005-01-03 11:00:06 AM  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Shipman   2005-01-03 10:52:58 AM  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Spot   2005-01-03 10:24:36 AM  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Laurence of the Rats   2005-01-03 10:00:41 AM  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2005-01-03 9:47:18 AM  

00:00