You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
Politicus: Chirac rolls out design for U.S.-European ties
2004-12-14
Politicus: Chirac rolls out design for U.S.-European ties
I'll bet he has a design. And we're in one little corner but paying the bills.
Via Lucianne:
In the American mind-set, there's nearly a lifetime to go - think Super Bowl and, maybe, Iraq's elections in the meanwhile - before George W. Bush comes to Europe in late February to make things trans-Atlantically whole and wonderful again. But European markers are coming down already. In London, the talk in Downing Street runs in the direction of Bush "doing something (!) substantive about the Israeli-Palestinian situation" if he wants to make good on the reaching-out-to-Europe notions that the administration uses to describe his trip.

In Berlin, the Germans clearly want better relations, but have made sealing the "fissures" and "breaches" more complicated by clamoring to sell arms to China and insisting last week that they require a permanent UN Security Council seat with veto power, like the big fellas. This, although a UN panel on reforming the Council does not recommend a German veto, and the Bush administration would likely choke on the idea.

The French, theoretically the ally with the furthest to go in improving ties with Bush administration, (Colin Powell describes the White House as specifically hoping to "mend" the relationship) have smartly laid out through a speech by Jacques Chirac a blueprint of where they want to be positioned in terms of the United States. The speech was made last month and has gotten only marginal attention. This is curious in the view of an aide to a European prime minister because he considers that Chirac was trying to explain for the first time how his multipolar view of the view of the world can be compatible with good relations between the United States and Europe.
Posted by:anonymous2U

#25  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 2b   2004-12-14 12:50:38 PM  

#24  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 2b   2004-12-14 12:50:38 PM  

#23  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Tom   2004-12-14 8:54:05 PM  

#22  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2004-12-14 8:39:13 PM  

#21  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2004-12-14 8:17:10 PM  

#20  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: trailing wife   2004-12-14 8:13:09 PM  

#19  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: lex   2004-12-14 5:44:15 PM  

#18  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: RWV   2004-12-14 5:31:28 PM  

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: RWV   2004-12-14 5:27:32 PM  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JFM   2004-12-14 3:24:23 PM  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: half   2004-12-14 2:04:58 PM  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: chicago mike   2004-12-14 2:04:25 PM  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: lex   2004-12-14 1:23:46 PM  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2004-12-14 1:05:01 PM  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 2b   2004-12-14 12:53:56 PM  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Desert Blondie   2004-12-14 12:30:32 PM  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 2b   2004-12-14 11:53:02 AM  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Spot   2004-12-14 9:12:36 AM  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Elder of Zion   2004-12-14 9:06:59 AM  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Tom   2004-12-14 9:05:41 AM  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2004-12-14 8:52:02 AM  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Elder of Zion   2004-12-14 8:43:44 AM  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2004-12-14 8:23:16 AM  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Steve   2004-12-14 8:10:58 AM  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Dave D.   2004-12-14 6:14:11 AM  

00:00