You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Tech
Debate on Secret Program Bursts Into Open
2004-12-11
An intense secret debate about a previously unknown, enormously expensive technical intelligence program has burst into light in the form of scathing criticism from members of the Senate Intelligence Committee. For two years, the senators have disclosed, Republicans and Democrats on the panel have voted to block the secret program, which is believed to be a system of new spy satellites. But it continues to be financed at a cost that former Congressional officials put at hundreds of millions of dollars a year with support from the House, the Bush administration and Congressional appropriations committees. Senator John D. Rockefeller IV of West Virginia, the ranking Democrat on the panel, denounced the program on Wednesday on the Senate floor as "totally unjustified and very, very wasteful." Senator Ron Wyden, Democrat of Oregon, later called it "unnecessary, ineffective, over budget and too expensive."

Neither senator would say much more about what he was referring to. Even in private on Thursday, most Congressional and intelligence officials who were asked refused to comment about the name, purpose or cost of the program. But former Congressional and intelligence officials who oppose it said it would duplicate capabilities in existence or in development, as part of the country's vast network of satellites, aircraft and drones designed for eavesdropping and reconnaissance. Among the possibilities suggested by private experts, including John Pike of Globalsecurity.org, a research organization in Alexandria, Va., were that the system might be a controversial unproven program to launch a reconnaissance satellite that adversaries could not detect. Former Congressional officials said they would discount speculation that the debate had to do with any antisatellite space warfare capability...
Posted by:Anonymoose

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: OldSpook   2004-12-11 6:38:21 PM  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: OldSpook   2004-12-11 6:38:21 PM  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Capt America   2004-12-11 8:21:35 PM  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Zenster   2004-12-11 7:04:32 PM  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: OldSpook   2004-12-11 6:38:21 PM  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: too true   2004-12-11 5:20:58 PM  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Douglas De Bono   2004-12-11 3:44:22 PM  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: phil_b   2004-12-11 12:50:53 PM  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2004-12-11 12:14:22 PM  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: half   2004-12-11 11:30:36 AM  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Matt   2004-12-11 11:24:06 AM  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: N Guard   2004-12-11 11:23:08 AM  

00:00