You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Tech
Scientists propose conservation parks on Mars
2004-11-28
I have a dream. In the dream, the normal people of this earth simultaneously reach the breaking point with this sort of nitwit, wolf-caller, or general loon. One Thursday afternoon, around 2:30, the normal world with turn on them and beat the living crap out of them all en masse. I don't know if it'll do any good, but it'll let us vent.
Next time you go for a stroll on Mars, be sure you don't leave any litter behind. A plan to keep parts of the red planet in their pristine state could see seven areas turned into 'planetary parks', regulated just like national parks here on Earth. The scheme has been proposed by Charles Cockell, a microbiologist for the British Antarctic Survey in Cambridge, and Gerda Horneck, an astrobiologist from the German Aerospace Centre in Cologne, Germany. "It is the right of every person to stand and stare across the beautiful barrenness and desolation of the Martian surface without having to endure the eyesore of pieces of crashed spacecraft scattered across the landscape," they write in the latest edition of Space Policy.
Now, didn't that cause an almost uncontrollable urge to holler "Oh, shuddup!"?
Although scientists have found no life on Mars, Cockell and Horneck point out that many national parks on Earth are protected partly for their geological interest and natural beauty, such as the Grand Canyon and Antarctica. "And if Mars has simple microbial life, there are even greater reasons for establishing planetary parks - to protect that life from human destruction," they write.
No human being has set foot on the planet yet, and these guys are already demanding to be put in charge — because of their superior Virtue™...
"We've already crashed unmanned spacecraft there - Mars Polar Lander and possibly Beagle 2 - so there's already an environmental issue," Cockell told news@nature.com. He says the crashes are as irresponsible as dropping robots over the Antarctic...
Posted by:Anonymoose

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: jackal   2004-11-28 10:08:18 PM  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: mojo   2004-11-28 4:33:14 PM  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2004-11-28 2:36:41 PM  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Dishman   2004-11-28 2:32:39 PM  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2004-11-28 1:29:50 PM  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: RJ Schwarz   2004-11-28 1:01:08 PM  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2004-11-28 12:35:13 PM  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: RWV   2004-11-28 12:32:11 PM  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: AJackson   2004-11-28 12:20:28 PM  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2004-11-28 12:19:12 PM  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Cornîliës   2004-11-28 12:05:25 PM  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2004-11-28 11:59:14 AM  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2004-11-28 11:57:49 AM  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2004-11-28 11:45:19 AM  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: N Guard   2004-11-28 9:55:21 AM  

00:00