You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Tech
Eglin Studying Bomb Bigger Than MOAB
2004-11-08
The Air Force built a weapon so big it was nicknamed ``Mother of All Bombs'' on the eve of the war with Iraq, but MOAB would be dwarfed by a much larger munition now being studied. The proposed Massive Ordnance Penetrator, or MOP, would weigh 30,000 pounds, nearly 40 percent more than the 21,000 pound MOAB - officially Massive Ordnance Air Blast - that never saw combat. ``The reason it's heavier than MOAB is that it has to penetrate a target,'' said Fred Davis, technical director for assessment and demonstrations at the Air Force Research Laboratory's Munitions Directorate.
The Army of Fred strikes again!
MOP would be designed to explode deep in the ground or inside a structure to destroy tunnels and bunkers or topple tall buildings. MOAB, on the other hand, explodes just above the ground. It is a larger version of the BLU-84 ``Daisy Cutter'' that was used during the Vietnam War to blast out helicopter landing zones in jungle areas. The 15,000-pound Daisy Cutter also was dropped during the 1991 Persian Gulf War to clear minefields and more recently to blast caves believed to be hiding terrorists in Afghanistan. MOAB can be against similar targets and structures or vehicles susceptible to surface blast damage. Both also are seen as psychological weapons that can demoralize an enemy. During the next 16 months the Munitions Directorate at this Florida Panhandle base will look at everything from MOP's shape to its guidance. The Pentagon's Defense Threat Reduation Agency is providing $500,000 in initial research money. If the project gets beyond the initial research and development phase, MOP probably won't see its first armed drop until 2006 or later. MOP would have inertial and satellite guidance, just like MOAB, but it would have a more slender shape so it could be dropped from high altitude by a B-52 or a B-2 stealth bomber.
With the B-2, they'll never see it coming.
The Daisy Cutter and MOAB are too bulky to be carried by sleek bombers and must be pushed out of the rear door of lower-flying and slower cargo planes.
Posted by:Steve

#22  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2004-11-08 9:53:07 PM  

#21  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Valentine   2004-11-08 9:51:46 PM  

#20  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: trailing wife   2004-11-08 9:47:13 PM  

#19  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: OldSpook   2004-11-08 9:44:35 PM  

#18  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Laurence of the Rats   2004-11-08 9:21:50 PM  

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2004-11-08 8:33:43 PM  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2004-11-08 8:33:32 PM  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Edward Yee   2004-11-08 8:18:39 PM  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2004-11-08 8:04:56 PM  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: John Q. Citizen   2004-11-08 7:43:03 PM  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2004-11-08 7:13:52 PM  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: smn   2004-11-08 7:11:48 PM  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Curtis LeMay   2004-11-08 6:38:40 PM  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2004-11-08 6:07:18 PM  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Kalle (kafir forever)   2004-11-08 6:07:15 PM  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Dishman   2004-11-08 5:37:43 PM  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Cheaderhead   2004-11-08 5:13:10 PM  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Steve   2004-11-08 4:45:41 PM  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2004-11-08 4:33:55 PM  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Cheaderhead   2004-11-08 4:18:37 PM  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anonymoose   2004-11-08 3:49:36 PM  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2004-11-08 3:38:28 PM  

00:00