You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Tech
US deploys satellite jamming system
2004-10-31
The US Air Force quietly has put into service a new weapon designed to jam enemy satellite communications, a significant step toward US control of space. The so-called Counter Communications System was declared operational late last month at Peterson Air Force Base in Colorado Springs, the Air Force Space Command said on Friday in e-mailed replies to questions from newsmen. The ground-based jammer uses electromagnetic radio frequency energy to knock out transmissions on a temporary and reversible basis, without frying components, the command said. "A reversible effect ensures that during the time of need, the adversary's space-based capability to threaten our forces is diminished," said Capt. Angie Blair, a spokeswoman. "Following the time of need, the space-based capabilities used by the adversary can return to its original state."

The device appears to have been put into service considerably earlier than had been projected by the Air Force as recently as February. At that time, a long-range planning document, dubbed the Transformation Flight Plan, said such a system would let the United States by 2010 "deny and disrupt an adversary's space-based communications and early warning" of attack.
Posted by:Mark Espinola

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Old Patriot   2004-10-31 10:10:09 PM  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: CrazyFool   2004-10-31 8:06:57 PM  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Spineshank   2004-10-31 8:04:08 PM  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2004-10-31 7:04:58 PM  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2004-10-31 6:51:56 PM  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: phil_b   2004-10-31 6:47:34 PM  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: borgboy   2004-10-31 4:58:54 PM  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Stephen   2004-10-31 4:37:53 PM  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Zenster   2004-10-31 2:56:35 PM  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: V is for Victory   2004-10-31 2:27:10 PM  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Zenster   2004-10-31 11:39:54 AM  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Laurence of the Rats   2004-10-31 11:35:48 AM  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Shipman   2004-10-31 10:50:41 AM  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Tom   2004-10-31 10:46:23 AM  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Shipman   2004-10-31 10:44:29 AM  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Tony (UK)   2004-10-31 8:08:58 AM  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2004-10-31 6:54:19 AM  

00:00