You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
The making of the terror myth
2004-10-15
This is very p[owerful. Do not read unless your tin foil hat is properly secured. EFL
Since September 11 Britain has been warned of the 'inevitability' of catastrophic terrorist attack. But has the danger been exaggerated? A major new TV documentary claims that the perceived threat is a politically driven fantasy - and al-Qaida a dark illusion. Andy Beckett reports (for the Guardian)

Since the attacks on the United States in September 2001, there have been more than a thousand references in British national newspapers, working out at almost one every single day, to the phrase "dirty bomb". There have been articles about how such a device can use ordinary explosives to spread lethal radiation; about how London would be evacuated in the event of such a detonation; about the Home Secretary David Blunkett's statement on terrorism in November 2002 that specifically raised the possibility of a dirty bomb being planted in Britain; and about the arrests of several groups of people, the latest only last month, for allegedly plotting exactly that.

Starting next Wednesday, BBC2 is to broadcast a three-part documentary series that will add further to what could be called the dirty bomb genre. But, as its title suggests, The Power of Nightmares: The Rise of the Politics of Fear takes a different view of the weapon's potential. "I don't think it would kill anybody," says Dr Theodore Rockwell, an authority on radiation, in an interview for the series. "You'll have trouble finding a serious report that would claim otherwise." The American department of energy, Rockwell continues, has simulated a dirty bomb explosion, "and they calculated that the most exposed individual would get a fairly high dose [of radiation], not life-threatening." And even this minor threat is open to question. The test assumed that no one fled the explosion for one year.
Posted by:Mrs. Davis

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: phil_b   2004-10-16 12:15:47 AM  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2004-10-15 11:56:08 PM  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2004-10-15 11:50:48 PM  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2004-10-15 11:50:21 PM  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2004-10-15 11:44:52 PM  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2004-10-15 11:37:10 PM  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2004-10-15 11:29:46 PM  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bryan   2004-10-15 9:52:58 PM  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: SteveS   2004-10-15 8:46:42 PM  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: phil_b   2004-10-15 8:05:53 PM  

00:00